I'm after comparisons between sales made on-line and those made in person (i.e.where a person has seen the real print before buying). I'm referring to prints bought as art to be used for decoration or collecting, rather than for reproduction or portraits/weddings etc.
My own sales in the last year have been 481 prints in person and 3 on-line. Does anybody have figures which could show me that my on-line sales are too low by comparison? What sort of ratios do you see in your own sales? Does anybody sell more than 5 prints a year on-line from their web sites or on ebay?
I guess I'm trying to quantify my belief that trying to sell prints to people who haven't seen the real thing is a waste of time.
Cheers,
My own sales in the last year have been 481 prints in person and 3 on-line. Does anybody have figures which could show me that my on-line sales are too low by comparison? What sort of ratios do you see in your own sales? Does anybody sell more than 5 prints a year on-line from their web sites or on ebay?
I guess I'm trying to quantify my belief that trying to sell prints to people who haven't seen the real thing is a waste of time.
Cheers,
However, I think people might be simply trying to say they're not interested in a polite way. Rather than tell you outright, they're saying "I'll think about it and come back later", but of course, never do and never intended to. That's no reflection on your web site's attractiveness or its ability to sell for you - those people were never going to buy in the first place. (BTW, you're not really trying to charge $2000 for shipping on your largest prints, are you?)
-- maybe next time. There are a lot of (art) galleries there, one would think there's a market that just needs an appropriate approach. Perhaps something directly-related to the churches and parks in your portfolios, a way to tap the interest of people who already visit those places?
