Graeme Hird said:I guess I'm trying to quantify my belief that trying to sell prints to people who haven't seen the real thing is a waste of time.
Graeme Hird said:my gallery is in Kalgoorlie, Western Australia
Francesco said:I agree Graeme, there has to be some concrete encouragement, in my case via sending print examples so that when viewing my work online potential customers have an understanding of the true print quality and know that the scan is but a pale representation.
Sjixxxy said:Just curious, how do you do this sampling? Make a print and stamp "Sample" over it in big letters? Give them something of absolutly no artistic value? (Here is a photo of my half eaten bag of cheetos) Other?
I think the secret is to not market my work as "art", but rather as a memento of the local area. About 70% of my sales to locals occur as they are thinking about leaving town. (Being a mining community, we have a high turnover of population, with about 4500 people leaving each year and being replaced by others. We get sales to about 5-10% of them.)rbarker said:Wow. 481 prints sold into a population of 25,000? That's darned impressive, Graeme. I'd say you live in an unusual community. While your work is excellent, it's unusual for that high a percentage of people within a community to be sufficiently interested in art to buy it.
You'll be made very welcome Robert. We'll even head over the road for a beer or two, served frosty cold by a skimpy barmaid ....roteague said:If I every get to Kalgoorlie, I'll be sure to visit your gallery. You never know where I might show up; just ask Nige and Kevin.
Is this "Galerie Kontrast" (sp?) in Sodermalm? I tried to visit but they were closedFrancesco said:There is only one gallery in Stockholm, Sweden that offers fine art photographic prints for sale, and they are not doing that well because Stockholm is too small a market...
I didn't see aWarEaglemtn said:"I can not justify selling large prints at below my costs."
But on eBay you can make up for it by selling in volume!!!
Selling at or slightly below cost is how many companies reduce competition and gain market share. It was how some companies during the Internet boom (whether intentional or not) survived their competition. They had more VC or a better IPO and were able to bleed more money than their peers.Graeme Hird said:I didn't see aafter this one, so I have to assume you are crazy ....
If selling at a loss in small volumes is painful, selling large volumes at a loss will be fatal.
(Hang on - isn't that what General Motors does?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?