Interesting bit of news on Civil Rights photographer.

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 2
  • 2
  • 55
Lake

A
Lake

  • 5
  • 1
  • 58
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 2
  • 0
  • 36
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 28
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 24

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,019
Messages
2,784,737
Members
99,777
Latest member
Assortment787
Recent bookmarks
0

panchro-press

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
122
Location
Cleveland
Format
Large Format
I know that's a big thing right now; but does his 'work' for the FBI invalidate his remarkable photographs?
I think a photographers work must stand alone. I frankly don't give a damn about an artist's political leanings.
Would his work have any more meaning were he to have been a member of the Communist Party?

Dave
-30-
 
OP
OP
Robert Brummitt
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
1,082
Location
Portland, Or
Format
Large Format
I would agree! A photographers work should and mostly speak for itself. I vaguely recall that Margaret Burke-White was looked into becasue of her involvement with the early days of the Communist Russia. Then there is the whole history of Edward Weston's old flame in Mexico, Tina M.
She was very mixed up with that conutry's political past.
 

Barry S

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
1,350
Location
DC Metro
Format
Large Format
To me, there's a world of difference between an artist having a political leaning, and betrayal of the confidence conferred by your profession. Photographers often depend on special access and acting as a paid spy is a betrayal of the most basic ethics of journalism. It erodes trust in photographers and journalists and that weakens democracy.
 
OP
OP
Robert Brummitt
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
1,082
Location
Portland, Or
Format
Large Format
But, maybe he or those he was watching over thought "What better way to find out what the FBI knows by working with them"?
 

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
Here's a story about it in the NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/14/us/14photographer.html?scp=1&sq=Withers&st=cse

I think there was a lot of pressure from the FBI on people like Withers, and I'm sure he wasn't making much money on his pictures, they're certainly worth a lot more today. And, as Robert says, perhaps there is a bit of "keep you friends close, keep your enemies closer" in his dealing with the FBI. It strikes me as a bit out of character, so perhaps the benefit of doubt is in order here.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,389
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
We do not know if he was black mailed into becoming an informant. There is not enough information for me to form an opinion.

By the way, in the last scene he is shown with a Hasselblad. Did the FBI buy that for him?

Steve
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom