I am just glad these people are still at it.
Using a donor camera for parts makes the cost of the part more expensive, since the camera has to be purchased (and most of it not used) and the part(s) have to be extracted and inspected before being put into a customer's camera. Plus, parts that are prone to failure will most probably have failed in the donor camera.What's happening is that the cost of service often far exceeds the value of the camera just to keep it working. Thus relegating an otherwise nice camera/lens/whatever to parts, shelf queen or the trash bin, driving up prices for working pieces (and broken ones, too!). Why spend $150 to CLA a $50 camera when I can buy 3 more working ones for the same amount? Even worse, some techs will only service specific models from a brand - usually the ones that don't need the service - so you end up back in the same situation. It's enough to question one's sanity.
Most technicians will inform you if the repair is going to cost more than the camera is worth.Maybe he got sick of doing $200 work on a $50 camera and not getting paid
Most technicians will inform you if the repair is going to cost more than the camera is worth.
Some people think that their skills are worth more than others, be aware of that. Other people are just trying to make an honest living and the cost of that has gone up significantly lately.....and there's instances where you don't particularly want to do the job, so you quote high to put them off.EDIT: I should add that I do support a person's right to charge whatever they think their skills are worth.
Evidently people become emotionally attached to a camera and want the job done regardless, some realise afterwards that that was a mistake and blame the tech.
What's happening is that the cost of service often far exceeds the value of the camera just to keep it working. Thus relegating an otherwise nice camera/lens/whatever to parts, shelf queen or the trash bin, driving up prices for working pieces (and broken ones, too!). Why spend $150 to CLA a $50 camera when I can buy 3 more working ones for the same amount? Even worse, some techs will only service specific models from a brand - usually the ones that don't need the service - so you end up back in the same situation. It's enough to question one's sanity.
An Agfa Isolette III overhaul (new bellows, focus, shutter, and rangefinder cleaning and calibration) was $165 less than 3 years ago. A recent quote on a Fujica Super 6 for a new bellows and shutter CLA was $425.
Add to that as the supply of replacement parts gets smaller, the price of those parts will tend to increase.Camera repair prices seem particularly illogical. As most of the examples referred to in this thread don't appear to involve cameras for which replacement parts are available, I would suggest that the only role that "inflation" is playing in recent changes is that the technicians who had very low prices in the past are waking up to the fact that those prices won't support a viable business with a plan for succession.
In short, the old prices didn't reflect the actual costs of the work.
Or to people just sucking it up and paying it, which I plan to. The thing is, yes you might be able to buy another camera for less money, but even if it's ok right then how long before IT has problems? Pay for a good CLA and going over and you're likely good for a while.
It costs what it costs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?