Yes, supposedly
I also think as some others said here that at least one piece of information is incorrect. If 600ml was usted instead of 900ml ..
Even that would not result in a completely blank film as long as some agitation took place.
Yes, supposedly
I also think as some others said here that at least one piece of information is incorrect. If 600ml was usted instead of 900ml ..
You don't need to replicate the experiment. If the question you want to answer is simply, "Can Xtol be used to process Rollei Superpan 200 film?" then all you need to do is to expose some of your Superpan and process it in Xtol. If you are loading your Superpan from a bulk roll, then the test roll can be a short one.To make an experiment to replicate the result again would mean sacrificing one or two rolls, and I am not sure it is worth the hassle. For me it is more easy to make a rule for myself not to develop agfa aviphot derived films in xtol, but to use rodinal or a traditional pq/mq developer instead.
Even that would not result in a completely blank film as long as some agitation took place.
Yes i prefer to use the stick. However, developer was mixed in a container first, so i doubt the result was due to flaws in the mixing.If that agitation was inversions, yes. In my initial post I suggested that maybe the little stick was used instead for doing twists/turns.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
