In your opinion, what are the best modern 35mm film SLRs ever built?

Dog Opposites

A
Dog Opposites

  • 2
  • 3
  • 111
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

A
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

  • 6
  • 5
  • 192
Finn Slough Fishing Net

A
Finn Slough Fishing Net

  • 1
  • 0
  • 108
Dried roses

A
Dried roses

  • 13
  • 7
  • 196
Hot Rod

A
Hot Rod

  • 5
  • 0
  • 118

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,470
Messages
2,759,547
Members
99,513
Latest member
yutaka96
Recent bookmarks
0

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,560
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
"... the best modern 35mm film SLRs ever built?"
Just a matter of taste, because the very last generations of SLRs were even ahead of needs.
The Dynax/Maxxum/Alpha 7 is one of the most sophisticated SLRs that one can get; I would prefer it over a Nikon F100 (matter of taste) just because I've always hated the focussing system on the Nikon F100 (I do a lot of shifting from manual focus to AF and the F100 sometimes gets confused and lock the shutter because the camera think that the image is not focused, then I loose the moment and also the picture. The Nikon F6 is far away better, every professional Nikon body is a very joyful experience.
The Dynax/Maxxum/Alpha 9 is a little outdated compared with the amazing Dynax/Maxxum/Alpha 7 but the construction and build quality is above than the quality that everyone would expect from a camera.
Obviously there are the exotic brands too: Leica R9, Contax RTS III, Contax N1. There are a lot of options and to be honest I think that the final choice should be taking in consideration the optics. I think that the right manner for chose a SLR should begin with the chose of the lens. Just get a lens that you love and then just attach to it the proper camera.

Agree 90%, but a crap body ruins the experience.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,498
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I need to compare my F4 with my Minolta 9, I find that that the 9 matrix metering is usually a 1/2 stop different from average. Oddly, the most accurate matrix metering I've used are with my Sigma SA 7 and 9 which is the same metering used on the SA9 and 10. I read that Nikon matrix metering was optimized for chrom, so if so a 1/4 stop under?
 

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,560
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
yeah, I'm a very slow shooter. The only time I shoot 36 exposure rolls is when I go on a vacation where I expect to shoot a lot over the course of 7 days. Last trip (Colorado, SE Utah, Arizona) I actually shot two whole rolls in 7 days--Mesa Verde, San Juan Mountains, Unaweep Canyon, Canyonlands, Arches, Dead Horse Point, Monument Valley, Moki Dugway, Natural Bridges, Capitol Reef, Kodachrome Basin, Bryce Canyon, Grand Canyon North Rim, Lee's Ferry, Marble Canyon, and Grand Canyon South Rim--72 total shots (and about 20 4x5).

That is a nice trip there and I hope to get up north on some of your visited locations. When I traveled out to AZ to see the parents I would usually travel up to the Grand Canyon at least and then come back down. Next fall I’ll be traveling north again but will hit Utah this time, unfortunately without a 4x5.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,129
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have noticed the matrix meters in the F4 and F100 are biased for negative film (Portra, TriX etc) while the matrix meter in the F6 is biased for reversal type films which is why it emphasizes not blowing out highlights - thus the issue w backlit scenes.
I prefer the negative film bias as that is how I look at scenes.

I have never heard that and I doubt that because Nikon would not know which film a future camera buyer may or may not choose.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,129
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I need to compare my F4 with my Minolta 9, I find that that the 9 matrix metering is usually a 1/2 stop different from average. Oddly, the most accurate matrix metering I've used are with my Sigma SA 7 and 9 which is the same metering used on the SA9 and 10. I read that Nikon matrix metering was optimized for chrom, so if so a 1/4 stop under?

Unless both cameras were calibrated by the same person with the same equipment that means nothing.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
You enjoy this kind of thread as much as the next man. Otherwise you wouldn’t be here.
It’s just hard to put into words exactly why. And hard to quantize exactly what they contribute.

No, I did not read it all all.

By mistake I clicked on it whilst going through "New Posts" and directly was brought to your post, which triggered my reply.
 

Thwyllo

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2022
Messages
99
Location
SW France
Format
Large Format Digital
Since I'm shopping around for a new-ish 35mm film SLR, I figured that I'd ask some of you more experienced professionals about this. (I've been shooting large format and medium format film for about 8 years and am working my way down to 35mm film!)

What 35mm film SLR camera systems do you think are the best to get into right now?
Which system do you think has the 'best' lenses?

I did a little research myself and settled on three cameras that I think might qualify:

-Minolta Maxxum 7 (also known as the 'Dynax 7' or 'Alpha-7')
-Nikon F6
-Contax N1

My simple question to you is WHY are you 'working your way down' to 35mm? You're inevitably going to see a hit as regards image quality, unless you spend very big bucks on some high level glass (the body frankly is secondary). Personally I'd just dip a toe...find a decent but cheap Nikkormat or FM/FE and a couple of half decent lenses (which don't even need to be OEM, there are tons of good third-party options out there for F-mount) and see how you get on. You might find the IQ hit versus portabiity an unacceptable price to pay?
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,498
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Unless both cameras were calibrated by the same person with the same equipment that means nothing.

That's true, at this point the only calibrated meter I have is my Gossen, I had my Minolta 101 calibrated it matches my Gossen, but the tech I was using moved to Portland, need to find another.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,068
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
I have never heard that and I doubt that because Nikon would not know which film a future camera buyer may or may not choose.

The F6 was designed to be the ultimate fine art/luxury slr as at that point Nikon knew the pro market had moved onto digital cameras.
It was designed to work best with chrome films as that is seem by many as the high water mark for careful/quality use. C41 films are much more flexible w/re to exposure, while chromes are not. Anyone shooting chromes knows to expose for the highlights as when you project them you do not want that blown out.
Nikon biased the matrix pattern in the F6 for chromes. And it is very easy to see without even taking a pic just by framing a backlit scene, and seeing the exposure change under the different metering patterns.
Remember, Nikon ballyhooed the 3D Color Matrix metering in the F6, claiming that it meters on what is in focus as that is what is the subject matter. Using a D or G lens that supposedly fully utilizes that (and I have done this with two separate F6s) shows backlit situations will still cause underexposure on the subject, even if the subject is relatively close to the camera. It's like the programmers' orders were to save the highlights. Which is what chromes need.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,129
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
That's true, at this point the only calibrated meter I have is my Gossen, I had my Minolta 101 calibrated it matches my Gossen, but the tech I was using moved to Portland, need to find another.

Or just move to Portland.
 
Last edited:

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,498
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Don't think the notion has not crossed my mind. Today, right now 105, yesterday it was 113, will get some relief tomorrow, next few days around a hundred with chance of monsoon storms. June is our hottest month, hoping for additional rain and average temps in July.
 

madNbad

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
1,402
Location
Portland, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
That would be the wisest move. Very good camera techs are real hard to find.

We have several really good shops. In addition to Blue Moon Camera and Machine there is Camera Solutions, Advance and Portland Camera Service. Plus I think Jadon Rosario, Red Dot Cameras Oregon is still in town.
 

Autonerd

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Messages
242
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Format
35mm
Disclaimer: Everyone has different priorities, and for me, price is important -- I love a good bargain. Besides, type of camera has very little influence on the quality of your photos -- what counts is the lens, film, and the person behind the rig. Given a competent photographer, a $35 Pentax MG can take just as good a photo as a $350 Nikon F4, so I opt for the Pentax (plus the Nikon is too heavy). With all that said...

What 35mm film SLR camera systems do you think are the best to get into right now?
I'm partial to Pentax K-mount cameras, but that may not qualify as "newer". If you're talking about autofocus/auto-wind cameras, hard to beat the price/performance of Minolta.
Which system do you think has the 'best' lenses?
I don't think it matters much -- they're all pretty good. I was born into the Pentax family, but one reason I like them is that the lenses are high quality and real bargains. For AF, it's almost impossible to beat the mid-90s-to-early-2000s Minoltas.

If you want the BEST buy, chalk up another vote for the Minolta Maxuum 5. It has TONS of features (as if Minolta knew the film days were over soon and was just shoveling everything into the cameras as they left the factory) and the prices are unbeatable -- I bought mine for $17 shipped (story here). Plus they were on sale so close to the digital age that I think many of them got only light usage before going on the shelf.

Personally I find auto-everything cameras a bit boring, and prefer manual focus/manual wind cameras. For those, I really like the Ricoh SLRs, particularly the KR-10 (not -10M or -10 Super), XR-2 and XR-1 (and their Sears equivalents). They use Pentax lenses (though the Rikenon and Sears Autos are pretty good too) and are a little unrefined but do a great job.

If you want to get into Nikon, the N8008 is a killer bargain. Does 95% of what the pro cams (F4, F5 -- overrated if you ask me) and N90 can do, and it's still a bargain. Plus it uses cheaper lenses (AF-D, I believe). For MF Nikon, the unloved FG is, I think, a great camera -- detested by the Nikonisti (most of whom would never deign to pick one up) and beloved by those of us who actually use them. And while the FM2/FM3 are highly regarded and way overpriced, the FM actually isn't crazy -- though I think clockwork-shutter cameras (as opposed to electronic shutters) are also overrated.

HTH
Aaron
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom