• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

In what sense is the 38mm f2.8 Sonnar on the Contax T or T2 a Sonnar lens?

Self-Portrait: Hands

H
Self-Portrait: Hands

  • 4
  • 2
  • 36
22897.jpg

A
22897.jpg

  • 1
  • 0
  • 38

Forum statistics

Threads
204,391
Messages
2,867,907
Members
102,251
Latest member
archgen
Recent bookmarks
0

alfu

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
25
Format
35mm
I am just after a bit of history of the lens design of the contax T or T2. The classic sonnar design is 7 elements in 3 groups (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeiss_Sonnar) but the contax is 5 elements in 4 groups. So what characteristics are inherited from the classic sonnar design? For example, is the famed bokeh and transition to OOF areas preserved?
 
Look further back into the history of the Sonnar and you'll find the Ernostar design. This is helpful in understanding the later derivatives that diverge from the classic 6/3 or 7/3 Sonnar formulae.
 
Pretty close from what I've seen. Search for Ernostar and Contax T lens block diagrams and you'll see considerable similarity. Same goes for the Nikon 35/2.8 in the L35AF - there's a good Nikon historical piece on the development of that lens floating around on the web somewhere.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom