In what sense is the 38mm f2.8 Sonnar on the Contax T or T2 a Sonnar lens?

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 6
  • 0
  • 84
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 9
  • 1
  • 80
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 3
  • 2
  • 66
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 5
  • 1
  • 68

Forum statistics

Threads
198,945
Messages
2,783,618
Members
99,756
Latest member
Kieran Scannell
Recent bookmarks
0

alfu

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
25
Format
35mm
I am just after a bit of history of the lens design of the contax T or T2. The classic sonnar design is 7 elements in 3 groups (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeiss_Sonnar) but the contax is 5 elements in 4 groups. So what characteristics are inherited from the classic sonnar design? For example, is the famed bokeh and transition to OOF areas preserved?
 

02Pilot

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
321
Format
Multi Format
Look further back into the history of the Sonnar and you'll find the Ernostar design. This is helpful in understanding the later derivatives that diverge from the classic 6/3 or 7/3 Sonnar formulae.
 

02Pilot

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
321
Format
Multi Format
Pretty close from what I've seen. Search for Ernostar and Contax T lens block diagrams and you'll see considerable similarity. Same goes for the Nikon 35/2.8 in the L35AF - there's a good Nikon historical piece on the development of that lens floating around on the web somewhere.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom