I'm frickin' lost

What is this?

D
What is this?

  • 3
  • 9
  • 94
On the edge of town.

A
On the edge of town.

  • 7
  • 6
  • 186
Peaceful

D
Peaceful

  • 2
  • 12
  • 342
Cycling with wife #2

D
Cycling with wife #2

  • 1
  • 3
  • 126

Forum statistics

Threads
198,289
Messages
2,772,390
Members
99,592
Latest member
gregmulvey
Recent bookmarks
0

kier

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
246
Format
Medium Format
OK, so, I got sick of digital. Well not totally, but I know it well enough now to know it's limitations, especially when it comes to experimental or off-the-beaten-path stuff. Like pinhole imaging.

The problem though, is that digital has made me picky. So I'm not going to be happy with something unless I can control every aspect of the process. I'm fine with someone processing my film, but I want some say in how it will be printed.

This is how I came to have a roll of Fuji Reala 100 ISO 120 format (shot in 6X6) put through a Holga that I converted to a Pinhole cam. I love the photos that came out of it. And I have the good fortune of working with someone who has an Imacon sitting on their desk. Sweet deal right?

Well, I've got a problem, and that is massive amounts of grain. These negatives were scanned at roughly 1400dpi. I had prints made from these scans at 8X8 (at 300dpi), and the prints are very grainy - the level of grain is comparable to some old 35mm TMax 400 8X10's I made that are sitting around. I don't have a problem with grain, but that's a bit ridiculous.

So, do I:
  1. Tell my friend to make an adjustment on the Imacon? What adjustment?
  2. Buy a flatbed scanner like an Epson v700?
  3. Just deal with the grain, ya wuss

Until today, I was thinking of the v700, but a lot of folks on here seem to think that's not going to give me sharp and enlargeable 35mm and 120 scans. Oh, and drum scans are just out of the picture - $25 per scan minimum, I ain't made of that kind of cash.

Any and all help/advice is very much appreciated. I'm attaching some samples to illustrate the point. One is a 100% crop (to show grain), the other is a web-sized version of the image (to show context).

Thanks everyone!!!
 

OldBikerPete

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
386
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
4x5 Format
You shouldn't be getting significant grain at 1400 DPI. I'm scanning Portra VC 5x4 at 2400DPI on an M1 and getting NO grain.
Is it grain or is it sensor noise? At 1400 DPI I suspect that it is mostly noise. Sensor noise can be avoided by causing the scanner to repeat the scan of each line multiple times and average the result for each pixel before advancing the film or scanning head.
 

jslabovitz

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
63
Location
Shanghai, WV
Format
Medium Format
Check for sharpening

I wonder if this is a result of over-sharpening?

The Imacon software has a somewhat annoying default sharpening setting of 250 (I think). Setting it to zero doesn't actually turn it off, although zero is usually fine with me. Your Imacon scanning buddy can set it to -120 for no sharpening. Try that, and see if your result is better.
 

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
The Imacon software has a somewhat annoying default sharpening setting of 250 (I think). Setting it to zero doesn't actually turn it off, although zero is usually fine with me. Your Imacon scanning buddy can set it to -120 for no sharpening. Try that, and see if your result is better.

Having just tested out an Imacon I think the quoted poster has hit the nail on the head. Your results look EXACTLY like what you get when using the default sharpening.
 

Marco B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
2,731
Location
The Netherla
Format
Multi Format
I second all of the remarks above. No, you shouldn't be getting that much grain from a 100ISO film at 1400ppi. Yes, it's likely this is over-sharpening. For some reference material, you can look at this page of my website:

http://www.boeringa.demon.nl/menu_technic_optimalscanningresolution.htm

All of the scans there have been made on an Imacon 949. As you can see, the first scan at a higher 2040ppi of Provia100F is pretty much grainless...
 

OldBikerPete

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
386
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
4x5 Format
Here's a 100% crop from an unaltered 2400 DPI scan of a 5x4 Portra VC 160 negative. I would expect the 120 emulsion to be the same but the film base is different.
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,466
Location
Milan
Format
Multi Format
It looks like over sharpening and an older Imacon that were known for grain aliasing. I had the same problems on a flextight years ago. Turning off unsharp mask will get rid of a portion of the issue.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
266
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Grain is the soul of film.

If you scan a Provia 100 F you might end up with 'pepper grain' - those tiny black spots which are typical for the Provia.

I'm scanning on a Coolscan 9000 @ 4.000 ppi and hardly have grain in the final print. Don't be mislead by the grain you can see on your monitor...
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom