Ilford mgrc v satin

[Emilro]

Hello everyone, I wanted to ask you a question, how different is the satin finish in the ilford mgrc v papers in relation to the pearl finish.

Anyone have any experience with this paper?

best regards

 

[pentaxuser]

Yes it is much more matt than you might expect from the word "Satin" I was surprised at how matt it is. It suits some scenes and may be a lot better for the likes of hand-colouring or you wish to avoid any reflectiveness in the print but frankly in my opinion Pearl is much more like what I think of when the word satin is mentioned

I hope this helps

pentaxuser

 

[Anon Ymous]

Yes, it's much more matt than what the name implies and it certainly has an impact on the density of the blacks. They're certainly weaker.

 

[MattKing]

Satin paper scans really well.

 

[miha]

Pearl is my favorite Ilford RC finish, very elegant. Yes, the blacks are not the strongest but there are also different aspects to strive for.
Edit: of course I meant satin, not pearl !

 

[Emilro]

Thanks for your comments, apparently it is not a very used paper but I will surely give it a try

 

[pentaxuser]

Thanks for your comments, apparently it is not a very used paper but I will surely give it a try

It truly is the only way you will ever know

pentaxuser

 

[bdial]

I prefer it to pearl, but it can be harder to find.
To my eye, pearl has a sort of textured look to it, where the satin appears smooth, and is slightly less reflective.
I think the pearl is meant to emulate the look of an air dried glossy fiber paper, but IMO, satin comes closer to that look.

 

[Emilro]

that is very interesting, I have only used the pearl and satin finish it is almost impossible to find at least where I live so I want to give it a try I am also very curious about the glossy finish in the new generation, I have only used it on the Kentmere papers without very pleasant results

 

[mshchem]

The new Ilford gen V rc in glossy is amazing. If you dry it on an old Ilford dryer like I was lucky to find, the gloss is better (or as good as) any other rc paper I've seen. It's so good you can't handle the prints except very carefully or you will see fingerprints. I haven't tried the satin. I like 5x5 and 5x7 inch prints, just received a box of pearl and glossy in 5x7. I've got a lot of negatives to print. For snapshots that are going to be handled the pearl works great.

Any of these surfaces can get glossy if over heated on a dryer, gets so hot the gelatin melts and levels.

 

[Emilro]

The new Ilford gen V rc in glossy is amazing. If you dry it on an old Ilford dryer like I was lucky to find, the gloss is better (or as good as) any other rc paper I've seen. It's so good you can't handle the prints except very carefully or you will see fingerprints. I haven't tried the satin. I like 5x5 and 5x7 inch prints, just received a box of pearl and glossy in 5x7. I've got a lot of negatives to print. For snapshots that are going to be handled the pearl works great.

Any of these surfaces can get glossy if over heated on a dryer, gets so hot the gelatin melts and levels.

I ended up ordering a glossy finish box

 

[grainyvision]

I really like the satin look, but it does give less contrast/less blacks than pearl. I love it for lower contrast prints where the depth of black isn't so important. It has a peculiar sheen to it that is extremely attractive to me .

 

[RalphLambrecht]

Yes it is much more matt than you might expect from the word "Satin" I was surprised at how matt it is. It suits some scenes and may be a lot better for the likes of hand-colouring or you wish to avoid any reflectiveness in the print but frankly in my opinion Pearl is much more like what I think of when the word satin is mentioned

I hope this helps

pentaxuser

I agree;think of satin as silk.