• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

If there could only be three black and white films...

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,816
Messages
2,845,843
Members
101,544
Latest member
johnsaigon0
Recent bookmarks
2
Why can't we have four black & white films?
 
For me, with current films it would be:
1. Acros 100
2. Tri-X or HP5+
3. Rollei 80s or 400s - good black and white and can also do infrared, no need to change rolls.
4. If I could add a fourth it would be Delta 400, a film I only started to shoot since last year and that I like more and more.
 
My two:

1) FP4+
2) TMAX 400 (Would use HP5+ if Kodak rebites the dust)

If you have to have three, the 3rd is a wildcard. "Just for fun". Acros only if you have to (stuff has to much curl).
 
My choice:
1) Fomapan 100 Pro (120)
2) FP4 (120,135)
3) HP5 (120,135)
 
For several decades I bought and tested every film, new or old, I found on the market. So I now have a freezer at home exclusively dedicated to things photographic and filled with odd lots of just about every film produced since the 1980s - Kodak Panatomic-X and Plus-X, even Verichrome Pan, Fuji B&W, Agfa and a big lot of Efke 120, probably 100+ rolls, as I liked this film a lot and bought up big but then they discontinued it and, oh well, you know.

So what do I use these days? For 35mm, Rollei 100 and 400 (in 30 cm/100 ft bulk rolls), which suits me just about every which way for the small lots of 35mm photography I do. In 120, four films only. The two Tmaxes, Ilford HP5+ and FP4+.

If I had to cut down to only one, I would go with one of the 400s. Whichever, it doesn't matter. Just now the Ilfords edge out the Kodaks by a very small margin. Both are essentially the same in terms of the end results I shoot for and expect.

Such are the joys of shooting 120 in Rolleiflex TLRs. Astounding sharpness, ease of handling, fast processing.

We live in a wonderful world, photographically speaking.
 
I think i can do with just two B&W films: Tri-X and P55. I really miss that last one.
 
1) HP5+ :smile:
2) HP5+ :sideways:
3) HP5+ :whistling:
 
hp5+
tmx
delta 3200

I shoot all at half box speed, rodinal for tmx, hc-110 for the others
 
Well if we list HIE, why not Panatomic-X, Royal-X Pan, Plus-X ...
 
It's also easy to forget that not so long ago, in the pre-ultra-high-speed (TMZ & D3200) era, most manufacturers had a core range of 2-3 B&W films & that of those, the slow films (Pan-F, FX, etc) were really marketed towards the 'Advanced Amateur' who either didn't have/ didn't want/ couldn't afford to move up a format size to get finer grain. How many of you could live with only FP4/ HP5 or PX/ TX etc (or their successors) today?
 
It's also easy to forget that not so long ago, in the pre-ultra-high-speed (TMZ & D3200) era, most manufacturers had a core range of 2-3 B&W films & that of those, the slow films (Pan-F, FX, etc) were really marketed towards the 'Advanced Amateur' who either didn't have/ didn't want/ couldn't afford to move up a format size to get finer grain. How many of you could live with only FP4/ HP5 or PX/ TX etc (or their successors) today?

I could live with that.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom