I'll take it that I made you wince then
Say, could there be any other possible reason to slow down? I mean it would be kind of fun eh.. to prop up your LF camera on your car's window sill and snap a few off while riding down the highway eh? I mean.. after all if you've been using it for years and have gotten to know it well.
Alright, snide humor bit over.. What about the cost of the film? And how many exposures you can make, and the time involved in loading the film holders and all that stuff? Wouldn't someone naturally want to slow down, smell the roses and make sure every last bit is exactly the way they want? I'm just askin'....
I know you wrote to be snide, but did it
ever occur to you that, until the 1950s,
photographers used press cameras just as
you suggest? Contemporaneous accounts
of the Hindenburg crash say the ground was
littered with film holders as the assembled
press photographers shot through their
film -- it was over in less than a minute
but dozens of negatives were shot in that
moment. They knew their tools and they
worked quickly, hand-held, impromptu.
Ask Weegee.
If expense is what is slowing you down,
then you're slowing up out of economics,
not artistic merit. And if you find artistic
merit in slowing down, you don't have to
use a camera that feels clumsy to you to
slow down. Just ... slow down.