Identifying Nikon F3: is it HP?

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Lake

A
Lake

  • 2
  • 0
  • 16
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 1
  • 0
  • 14
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 14
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 13

Forum statistics

Threads
199,015
Messages
2,784,655
Members
99,772
Latest member
samiams
Recent bookmarks
0

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
I have found a gent not to distant from me that has two Nikons for sale. One is an FE w/MD12 and the other is an F3 w/MD4. No lenses are being offered and I feel his prices are a might high but when asked he was unable answer if the F3 is the HP version. I am considering picking up either one of these cameras regardless if I buy from this individual or not but I would still like to be able to identify the HP vs. the standard view prism. If I were to pick up an F3 I would prefer the standard because as I understand, the HP is somewhat of a dimmer VF and with my aging eyes I need as much light as I can get. I may just end up getting both cameras if we can come to an equitable agreement but that is yet to be seen due to the holidays.

So to the question, how does one determine which is which?
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Looking at the front of the finder, the letters HP appear below and just to the right of the Nikon name.

EDIT, add'l info:
I don't think the image is dimmer on the HP finder, but it is smaller, so it and the exposure info can be seen with the eye up to 25mm (1 inch) from the eyepiece. I like it because I wear glasses, but otherwise I'd rather use the standard finder for the extra magnification. The HP has 75% magnification; the standard finder has 80% magnification, which is a noticeable difference. Even with glasses the standard (DE-2) finder is pretty good. The standard finder is a little more compact, and in my opinion, looks better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
Whew, quick respons time, like blazing fast :laugh:

I have yet to lay hands on the cameras and all attempts to have him email me photos have apparently fallen on deaf ears. So that gives me more info than I had before, I have never handled either of these cameras before and so I am a total noob especially when it comes to Nikon. Thanks.
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
The F3 has a very smooth and light film wind. LCD in the finder is small, so a little hard to read, especially when metering manually. A nice feel, good balance, good ergos. A tough machine, electronics are very reliable. Many very old ones are still going fine.

Make sure it has the cover on the bottom under the film cartridge compartment, which is removed to fit a motor drive. I priced a replacement for mine, and it was $25-30. If it's missing it might be stored in the end of the motor drive, if that's around.
I taped a dime over the opening and didn't sweat it. My (ahem) out of pocket expense: 10 cents.

One thing: the meter illumination switch, with a tiny red button on the right side of the finder, had to have been designed after a lunch where too much sake was consumed. It often doesn't work or works intermittently; even when it does, it has no feel. I would not reject an otherwise good F3 if it doesn't function properly, another is likely no better.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
There are very few cameras with a build quality like the F3 that is obvious the moment you exercise it. Although it doesn't differ much in size to Nikon's smallest (FG/EM/FG20) and medium (FM/FE/FA) size SLRs, there is a substantial difference in weight that will be obvious if you have them hanging on your neck.

standard.jpg


Keep in mind that the F3 system uses a special flash shoe. Although there are adapters for standard shoe flashes, only the hard to find and quite expensive AS-17 enables TTL capable flash to work on the F3.

standard.jpg


These adapters make it convenient to use one flash across F3 and standard shoe bodies but Nikon offered flashes for both.
 

fstop

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,119
Format
35mm
Whew, quick respons time, like blazing fast :laugh:

I have yet to lay hands on the cameras and all attempts to have him email me photos have apparently fallen on deaf ears. So that gives me more info than I had before, I have never handled either of these cameras before and so I am a total noob especially when it comes to Nikon. Thanks.

If you have Minolta background you will like both the FE and the F3. The FE has aperture priority and plenty of features,the F3 has always been a favorite of mine because it does everything the Minolta XK does and is cheaper,smaller and lighter. plus the standard body can take a motor drive.
 

TriXfan

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
44
Format
35mm
And while you're considering -- check out the Nikon F2, whose shutter will work on all speeds without ever needing a battery.
 
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
I just recently received a Nikon S2 and F in a deal and soon after I bought an F2 from a member here and have been enjoying all of them. An F3/FE is not a need but a want. From what I understand, both cameras will work with my non-AI lenses and if I want to in the future I can step up to AI lenses.
 

fstop

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,119
Format
35mm
Yes that is correct.
 
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
Just got off the phone with the guy, he sent me some pis and they look good. Now I just have to set up a time to see them. The F3 is the non-HP version and from what I saw it looks well cared for.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
I just recently received a Nikon S2 and F in a deal and soon after I bought an F2 from a member here and have been enjoying all of them. An F3/FE is not a need but a want. From what I understand, both cameras will work with my non-AI lenses and if I want to in the future I can step up to AI lenses.

Which finder for the F2?

With the F3, you've completed a trifecta . . . ;-)

standard.jpg


Also, you can have none AI lenses converted to AI for very reasonable price too.
 
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
I bought a 35-135 finder off eBay, it's not the Nikon but it works for my needs. If I were to convert my non-AI lenses to AI would I still be able to use them on my F/F2?
 

EthanFrank

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
92
Location
Toronto, Can
Format
Multi Format
If you don't wear glasses, I suspect you'll much prefer the non-HP finder. I briefly owned both, and the non-Hp was always my favorite. I'm not quite sure why the F3HP commands a premium...

In any case, one of the great things about the F3 is that if you don't like your finder, you can just swap it out!
 

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
I wear glasses and have an F3hp with a 55mm micro Nikkor lens. I bought it new for some scientific photography and it's a beautiful camera.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
I bought a 35-135 finder off eBay, it's not the Nikon but it works for my needs. If I were to convert my non-AI lenses to AI would I still be able to use them on my F/F2?

35-135 finder must be for your S2?

Since I can use AI lenses on my F and FT3, I am going to assume that a AI converted lens will be just as useful. My F2 has the DP-11 finder which makes it an F2A and AI lenses are more useful for it.

Here is a link to the conversion that I have seen but not tried myself -> AI Conversions for Nikon Lenses
 
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
Sorry about that, that finder is for the S2. I have the finder that makes it an F2A2, not sure which one it is right now.
 

fstop

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,119
Format
35mm
probably a typo I think he meant F2AS
 
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
Crap. To many damn models, variations and flavors to keep track of. It's an F2 with a big honkin view finder on top, why does Nikon have to be so complicated. I think it might be the F2AS, there is a square piece on top that has a +> <- and two lights over those showing over/under exposure. There is a little window in the front face just over the lower case "n" in Nikon that I still haven't figured out because it doesn't change when the aperture is changed and it looks like "18*" inside of it. If you couldn't tell, I'm a novice with these Nikons.
 
OP
OP
guitstik

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
I looked under the finder and there is a tag saying it is a DP-2.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom