Identifying and appraising a 5x7 aircraft camera.

Junkyard

D
Junkyard

  • 1
  • 2
  • 53
Double exposure.jpg

H
Double exposure.jpg

  • 5
  • 3
  • 179
RIP

D
RIP

  • 0
  • 2
  • 216
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 195
Street with Construction

H
Street with Construction

  • 1
  • 0
  • 186

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,338
Messages
2,789,920
Members
99,877
Latest member
Duggbug
Recent bookmarks
0

Stock Dektol

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
66
Location
New York
Format
Multi Format
Hey guys,

I stumbled upon this aircraft camera at a thrift store for $20 and had to have it. Identifying the exact model is proving difficult. The lens shade identifies it as a model K-24 aircraft camera, however no k-24's i've found resemble this thing. I do know that it's a 5x7, and that it's got a 300mm f/5 Kodak Aerostigmat lens. The camera weighs about 25 pounds, and is 2 feet long. It seems to be made out of fiberglass with metal and wood elements. The film holder has a "Thomas Airviews" logo stamped onto it, and the shutter mechanism (which is removable) is covered in what I assume are Japanese characters. Here are some iphone images of the camera. Does anyone have information about it?


Here is a link to the images.

http://imgur.com/a/mP6qf
 

Attachments

  • image copy.jpg
    image copy.jpg
    44.6 KB · Views: 234
  • image copy.jpg
    image copy.jpg
    44.6 KB · Views: 198

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,838
Format
Multi Format
The lens cone (not shade) is from a K-24. The K-24 shot 4.5" x 4.5" on 5" roll film.

Your camera is probably a home brew. Real aerial cameras are usually all metal.

By the time the K-24 was in use (WW-II) aerial cameras shot roll film. The sizes most commonly used by USAF were 5" (images 4.5" x 4.5") and 10" (images 9" x 9"). No 5x7. Did you measure correctly?

The 12"/5 Aerostigmat was designed sometime in the 1930s, is rated to cover 5" x 5" and isn't highly respected.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
The writing is indeed Japanese, apparently having to do with a heater control and perhaps shutter controls. I don't recognize the logo with the stylized five petal cherry blossom containing the Japanese character for the figure 6. The camera is almost certainly a hodgepodge of several parts. I paid a lot more for just a lens like that with its lens cone.
 
OP
OP
Stock Dektol

Stock Dektol

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
66
Location
New York
Format
Multi Format
Any idea what the lens, or whole package would be worth?
 

xya

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2010
Messages
1,039
Location
Calais, Köln
Format
Multi Format
Last edited by a moderator:

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
Couple hundred $, if that . The lens is not highly sought after, the rest is just a paperweight. sad but true.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
The Konishiroku logo doesn't appear anywhere on my Konishiroku cabinet size glass plate strut camera kit produced for the Japanese Navy in June, 1944. It is beautifully made outfit, unlike some military equipment produced so late in WWII. Alas, the focal plane shutter no longer works. I paid $40 for it at a gun show a few decades ago. Googling for "Konica military camera turned up only one image: https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...6eQ6GROVmXJd9WwM429OARCemGuwm8MyKgqtOOwjpUu3Q
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom