roteague said:The collapsable rails on the Arca-Swiss are nice. I've thought about getting one, for this very reason.
Ah - but the "shell" is not a part of the structure, like it is on the Carbon Infinity.Amund said:The Arca Misura looks really nice. Very portable. I want one.
Ole said:Ah - but the "shell" is not a part of the structure, like it is on the Carbon Infinity.
No - it weights 3.3 kg. Not in the case, it is the case. There's an additional black leather bag with it, another kilo or so.Amund said:But you Carbon wonder doesn`t weigh 2.65kg(including the case) either
Ole said:No - it weights 3.3 kg.
No focus creep, fine and coarse focus on both front and rear, movements only limited by bellows (and everything locks down very tightly).
I have never had focus creep with my Arca. I would suggest a trip to the repair shop!JohnArs said:Can't recomand a camera like Arca wich has the troubles thad when you focused and you lock the camera down it still slides on the rail and creates focus shift.....
Ultra-light? Like a minox?David A. Goldfarb said:Sinar F and Arca F-line are field cameras in comparison with their studio models, Sinar P and Arca M.
Gowland and Toho are ultralight cameras more for backpacking.
jnanian said:game
what kind of lenses were you thinking of using ?
there is a graphic view 1 in the classifieds right now ( lens, film holders and fiber box included ). looks like a good deal
i had a graphic view 2 and it was a great camera ( i still miss it )
took it on location all the time ( documented a quarry with it -- close to 200 negatives delivered ). the only reason i sold mine was because i needed to be able to use a 65mm lens, and while i was able to use a 90mm with a recessed lens board without a problem ( full movements ) i knew the 65 was going to be a tough customer.
sometimes expensive / exquisite isn't always the best
good luck
--john
raucousimages said:Toyo 45D or 45E. They were ment to be studio cameras but if you take them to the field it's a field camera, Right? I have used them in the field many times. They are easy to find, inexpensive, easy to find parts and accessories and easy to resell if you upgrade to a nicer camera. Of the cameras on your list the only one I have had a lot of experence with is the Toyo 125VX. I paid $1600.00 USD. I love it. I am a big Toyo fan.
Hmmm. Maybe you just answered my question. Ha!raucousimages said:"... They were ment to be studio cameras but if you take them to the field it's a field camera, Right...?"
epatsellis said:I'd second that recommendation, of course I'm biased as it's my GVI in the classifieds
Seriously, though, I used that camera in the field quite a bit, with one endcap left off, the standards rack right off, and it can be packed in a small, school sized backpack with another lens on a board and a dozen or so holders. I'd still be using it, were it not for winning a stupidly low bid on a 45D on Ebay 7 months ago, I'm in the middle of a move and realized that while it looks good sitting on the shelf, I'd rather see somebody use it and get involved in large format more than as a decoration. I still have a GVI project I bought to have spare parts and will probably build a short monorail for field use with it. If I wasn't moving, chances are I'd never sell it.
erie
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?