I want to buy a field monorail

Lacock Abbey detail

A
Lacock Abbey detail

  • 0
  • 1
  • 21
Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 39
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 65
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 60
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 51

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,905
Messages
2,782,826
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Four ways of transporting a Sinar F-series--

1--Assembled and ready for use. This requires a trunk case. Fine for wheeling about town or in a vehicle for architectural jobs and such, but the case is bulky and heavy.

2--Packed like a brick, either on a short rail or with the rail removed. This is the most compact and sturdy way of carrying the camera, best suited to backpacking. You can leave the tripod mount on the tripod and it acts as a quick release. Just pop the rail into the tripod mount, level using the handy bubble levels, and tighten, and you're ready to go. Add more rail if you need it.

3--Unclip the bellows from the front panel (a flick of a lever), tilt front standard all the way back, raise rear standard and tilt it all the way forward. I don't have the camera in front of me, so I think I've got that right. If not it's the other way around with regard to the front and rear standards. You can leave the camera on the 12" rail this way and carry it easily in a shoulder bag with the tripod mount on the tripod.

4--Unclip bellows and set both standards parallel to the rail. The camera packs flat this way for transportation in a briefcase.
 

Amund

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
902
Location
Oslo,Norway
Format
Multi Format

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
Amund said:
The Arca Misura looks really nice. Very portable. I want one.
Ah - but the "shell" is not a part of the structure, like it is on the Carbon Infinity. :tongue:
 

Amund

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
902
Location
Oslo,Norway
Format
Multi Format
Ole said:
Ah - but the "shell" is not a part of the structure, like it is on the Carbon Infinity. :tongue:

:smile: But you Carbon wonder doesn`t weigh 2.65kg(including the case) either :wink:
 

JohnArs

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
1,074
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Can't recomand a camera like Arca wich has the troubles thad when you focused and you lock the camera down it still slides on the rail and creates focus shift, this is the worst thing a camera can do espesially if you work in a hassle to catch the light!
My rec. buy a Sinar F, F1 or F2 the F stands for Field!
F1 3,3 kg, F2 3,6 kg
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
Amund said:
:smile: But you Carbon wonder doesn`t weigh 2.65kg(including the case) either :wink:
No - it weights 3.3 kg. Not in the case, it is the case. There's an additional black leather bag with it, another kilo or so.
And usable extension (flat board) from 30 to 540mm, closes up nicely with a 180mm Symmar inside, et cetera....

No focus creep, fine and coarse focus on both front and rear, movements only limited by bellows (and everything locks down very tightly).
 

argus

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,128
Format
Multi Format
A field monorail?

That sounds like contradictio in terminis to me, except for Ole's Carbon. But than again, it's a folding, not a monorail.

Field cameras are lighter that monorails. If not, the budget to buy a lightweight monorail will be high!

G
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Sinar F and Arca F-line are field cameras in comparison with their studio models, Sinar P and Arca M.

Gowland and Toho are ultralight cameras more for backpacking.
 

morkolv

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
203
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
Carbon Infinity

Ole said:
No - it weights 3.3 kg.
No focus creep, fine and coarse focus on both front and rear, movements only limited by bellows (and everything locks down very tightly).

Ole, where can we meet to have a (envy) look as this wonder of a camera (girl)?? 90-60-90 ?

Stockholm?? Or can I watch your house and water the flowers in mid/last july ?? :cool: :cool:
 

SteveH

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
552
Location
Wilmington,
Format
4x5 Format
I *********LLLLLLLOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEE********* My Sinar F2. All of the calculators are great for noobs, and techie geeks alike. I've taken mine every where. If you're a biker, shoot me a PM and I'll give you plans to make a nice rack for your bike to carry the cam with
 

resummerfield

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
1,467
Location
Alaska
Format
Multi Format
JohnArs said:
Can't recomand a camera like Arca wich has the troubles thad when you focused and you lock the camera down it still slides on the rail and creates focus shift.....
I have never had focus creep with my Arca. I would suggest a trip to the repair shop!
 

Markok765

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
2,262
Location
Ontario, Can
Format
Medium Format
David A. Goldfarb said:
Sinar F and Arca F-line are field cameras in comparison with their studio models, Sinar P and Arca M.

Gowland and Toho are ultralight cameras more for backpacking.
Ultra-light? Like a minox?
 

epatsellis

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
928
Format
Multi Format
jnanian said:
game

what kind of lenses were you thinking of using ?

there is a graphic view 1 in the classifieds right now ( lens, film holders and fiber box included ). looks like a good deal


i had a graphic view 2 and it was a great camera ( i still miss it )
took it on location all the time ( documented a quarry with it -- close to 200 negatives delivered ). the only reason i sold mine was because i needed to be able to use a 65mm lens, and while i was able to use a 90mm with a recessed lens board without a problem ( full movements ) i knew the 65 was going to be a tough customer.


sometimes expensive / exquisite isn't always the best :smile:

good luck

--john



I'd second that recommendation, of course I'm biased as it's my GVI in the classifieds :smile:

Seriously, though, I used that camera in the field quite a bit, with one endcap left off, the standards rack right off, and it can be packed in a small, school sized backpack with another lens on a board and a dozen or so holders. I'd still be using it, were it not for winning a stupidly low bid on a 45D on Ebay 7 months ago, I'm in the middle of a move and realized that while it looks good sitting on the shelf, I'd rather see somebody use it and get involved in large format more than as a decoration. I still have a GVI project I bought to have spare parts and will probably build a short monorail for field use with it. If I wasn't moving, chances are I'd never sell it.


erie
 

raucousimages

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
824
Location
Salt Lake
Format
Large Format
Toyo 45D or 45E. They were ment to be studio cameras but if you take them to the field it's a field camera, Right? I have used them in the field many times. They are easy to find, inexpensive, easy to find parts and accessories and easy to resell if you upgrade to a nicer camera. Of the cameras on your list the only one I have had a lot of experence with is the Toyo 125VX. I paid $1600.00 USD. I love it. I am a big Toyo fan.
 

epatsellis

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
928
Format
Multi Format
If I told you what I won mine on Ebay for, you'd kill me, but basically cheaper than a toyo lensboard.

erie

raucousimages said:
Toyo 45D or 45E. They were ment to be studio cameras but if you take them to the field it's a field camera, Right? I have used them in the field many times. They are easy to find, inexpensive, easy to find parts and accessories and easy to resell if you upgrade to a nicer camera. Of the cameras on your list the only one I have had a lot of experence with is the Toyo 125VX. I paid $1600.00 USD. I love it. I am a big Toyo fan.
 

bob01721

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
420
Location
Orlando, FL
Format
Multi Format
Just curious about the term field monorail. I always thought there were field cameras (which fold) and monorails (which don't fold). I always considered folding cameras more appropriate to "the field" and monorails more appropriate to "the studio."

Mine is a monorail (B&J Grover) which I use "in the field," but I don't think of it as a field camera. Am I being pedantic?
 

bob01721

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
420
Location
Orlando, FL
Format
Multi Format
raucousimages said:
"... They were ment to be studio cameras but if you take them to the field it's a field camera, Right...?"
Hmmm. Maybe you just answered my question. Ha!
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
epatsellis said:
I'd second that recommendation, of course I'm biased as it's my GVI in the classifieds :smile:

Seriously, though, I used that camera in the field quite a bit, with one endcap left off, the standards rack right off, and it can be packed in a small, school sized backpack with another lens on a board and a dozen or so holders. I'd still be using it, were it not for winning a stupidly low bid on a 45D on Ebay 7 months ago, I'm in the middle of a move and realized that while it looks good sitting on the shelf, I'd rather see somebody use it and get involved in large format more than as a decoration. I still have a GVI project I bought to have spare parts and will probably build a short monorail for field use with it. If I wasn't moving, chances are I'd never sell it.


erie

i know erie

it is a great camera :smile:

-j
 

naturephoto1

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,960
Location
Breinigsville
Format
Multi Format
I like my Linhof Technikardan 45S. You do have to get used to folding and unfolding the camera. As Roger indicates it is a very nice camera but a bit heavy. When you get used to setting up, it is fairly quick to use. However, it is probably out of your price range.

Rich
 
OP
OP

game

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
368
Location
netherlands
Format
Multi Format
thanks for the comments!

Can someone elaborate on the differences between the toyo's and the sinar F's. Are they quite comparable?

game
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Given how cheap the Sinars are these days, I'd go for a Sinar F-series over a Toyo 45D or E.

The Sinar has handy DOF and tilt/swing calculators and yaw-free swings, interchangeable bellows, and lots of flexibility with many system accessories. It's easy to add more rail, another bellows and standard, format conversion kits, or mix and match between the F system and the P system. They sold a camera called the "C," for instance, with a P rear standard for asymmetric tilts and swings and an F front standard for lighter weight than a P.

One downside to the F and F1 is that the front clamp is easy to break, if you overtighten it. It's also easy not to break, if you don't handle the camera like a gorilla, but if purchasing a used camera, make sure the front standard clamp is intact.
 

jovo

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,120
Location
Jacksonville
Format
Multi Format
I have and use a Toyo 45D in the "field" which is pretty much the only place I take photographs anyway. With the darkcloth on my shoulder I carry it resting on the darkcloth mounted on the tripod. The relative comfort or lack thereof depends on the terrain and the distance carried. Whichever monorail you choose (other than the ultralight Toho or Gowland) you will probably encounter a similar set of variables that will also vary with your fitness. It's always amusing to 'haggle' over a pound or so in choosing a 4x5, and then to encounter someone with an 8x10 over their shoulder....one just has to stop and laugh.

I think David's suggestion about the Sinar is excellent. The Toyos are also good when the price is a factor....a solid performer with all the status of a rusty Yugo. Good luck.
 
OP
OP

game

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
368
Location
netherlands
Format
Multi Format
Guess I will go on a sinar hunt than.

there is a thing I always wonder regarding LF lenses. I sometimes see the ones that still have the metal coloured housing. And some that are all black. I have the feeling the latter are newer, and therefor better. Is that a save assumption?
Or quicker, what to pay attention to, as it comes to lenses?

and does it matter for the field wether you buy a f,f1,f2?

Thanks! game
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom