I need a New lightmeter

Barbara

A
Barbara

  • 2
  • 0
  • 74
The nights are dark and empty

A
The nights are dark and empty

  • 10
  • 5
  • 129
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

H
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

  • 0
  • 0
  • 61
Nymphaea

H
Nymphaea

  • 1
  • 0
  • 51

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,929
Messages
2,783,270
Members
99,748
Latest member
Richard Lawson
Recent bookmarks
0

trife86

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
5
Format
35mm
I just got into 35mm i got a nice cam / lens (Minolta Rokkor-x 50mm)
Im trying to get some nice night time shots in nyc. Ive seen people use exposure lentghs of over like 5mins. Do lightmeters tell you to hold a exposure that long?
All i ever used is the TTL meter. Id like to get something cheap that will help me figure the exposure i need for nightshots
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
451
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
I use a Sekonic L558 for night photography. It's quite accurate, and much more sensitive than either the L508 or L608. However, if I spot meter some dark corner of a scene, the meter can't read it. There are certainly limits to the sensitivity of the cells. I often use the incident meter on a lit spot of the street. Works very well.

The trick to night photos is choosing what to meter. You're going to have to make sacrifices along the way. Some shadows are going to be lost, and a lot of highlights will need burning in. I'd say that's the nature of the beast. When you figure it out, you can get lovely results.

I eventually found that for the subjects that I shoot, I'm usually in the realm of f11 2min, on fuji acros 100 film. That's Toronto street lights. Time Square - I'm sure - is a different animal entirely!
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
Sorry, but cheap and good for low light don't go together with light meters. I have a Sekonic L-508, and it's pretty good in dark lighting conditions. It might be among the best, with only the newer L-558 besting it. I bought that meter quite a few years ago and it cost about $500 back then. The latest meters in that family are selling for that much and more. Better to use Fred Parker's guide. It's quite good and you'll learn a lot more about light because you'll be forced into being very observant.
 

thuggins

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
1,144
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Multi Format
If you want to take night shots, you need an OM-2 or OM-4. Olympus invented a method to directly read the actual exposure of the film. This is the only way to guarantee perfect night shots every time.
 

nemo999

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
277
Format
35mm
For GENERAL photography a relatively inexpensive meter such as a Sekonic L-308B is great - I have one of these and also a Sekonic L-358, which is just a little larger, more robust and has some additional functions which I never use. However, as another contributor has remarked, night shots are something else. The only real way to meter these accurately is with a spot meter - meter the highlights and give 2 stops more exposure. As the bright parts of night scenes can be small, the spot meter needs to be a "real" one (1°) like a Pentax, for example, and not a regular meter with a 5° attachment. As the level of lighting of buildings at night does not vary all that much, you could do worse than start with the exposure recommended above and bracket exposures slightly either way (cheaper than buying a meter if you would use this only for night shots). As regards Fred Parker, he has his admirers but I am not among them!
 

IloveTLRs

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
1,132
Location
Boston
Format
Sub 35mm
No one mentioned the Gossen Digisix? It can meter exposures up to 4 minutes.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,087
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
How about forgetting the meter? Plenty of suggested times for night shots have been printed. A couple of test rolls and some note-taking, and you should be able to establish good exposure times/fstops for city scenes. A meter will not give you accurate times without the testing in any case -- reciprocity failure will come into play and over-ride whatever a meter might tell you. A meter reading of 6 minutes with Tri-X would have to be up to 1 hour long when reciprocity failure is taken into account (as per Michael Kenna).

Vaughn

For example, Michael Kenna recommends for T-Max 400 at f/5.6 (reciprocity failure factors included);
City skylines and scenes with direct street lighting -- 3 seconds
City with indirect indirect street lighting -- 20 seconds
City open spaces with distant lighting (parks, etc) -- 40 to 80 seconds
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Shiny

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
265
Location
Newcastle up
Format
Multi Format
I second the no meter approach, I don't use one at night. Just go out and shoot a roll - i normally find exposures from around 4 to 12 minutes at f8/f11 for night cityscapes, try a few times for the same scene.

This one was 10 mins at f8
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

Jim
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom