I just bought (and registered) a new Nikon F6

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 1
  • 1
  • 20
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 4
  • 1
  • 49
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 12
  • 7
  • 101
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 59
Life Ring

A
Life Ring

  • 4
  • 2
  • 53

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,908
Messages
2,766,705
Members
99,500
Latest member
Neilmark
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
1,507
Location
Maine!
Format
Medium Format
Ok, well I found an "open box" F6, and the shop cut me a deal, so I paid roughly what the grey market ones go for. But still, it was on roll 0. And now it has a 3 year warranty with Nikon!

My impressions? Well it's exceeding my expectations. Personally I thought the old D2H AF system would show it's rear in ways my D750s AF doesn't. I'm pleasantly surprised at how good it is. I also though the AF spread would be constricting, considering it was designed for crop. Not so, the spread is great! The rule of 3rds points are pretty much right where I want them. That old 5 point system in my F100 feels antiquated. It's faster than the F100 for sure. Faster than the F5? Idk, I don't have one on hand. Personally I think the F5 is a non starter due to it's size. I'll take the better accuracy and point spread over raw speed anyways.

Am I wrong that the screen shows nearly F2 depth of field? I'd swear that it does. It's a fabulous finder. I installed a DK-17M and I can still see out to the edges. I have 4 rolls to pick up tonight (Provia, Velvia, and 400H), and if the focus system is as good as I think, I'll probably go back to the standard finder for the slightly better eye relief.

We have all these absurdly sharp lenses now. I'm using the Sigma 24/1.4, 35/1.4, and Nikon 58mm 1.4G. These three lenses are my basic wedding kit. I can't wait to see chromes from these lenses, particularly the 58mm. AND, given the data imprint system, if the 58mm is giving me trouble at 1.4 focus-wise, I'll know from the frame instead of trying to remember.

I also put the metering system through it's paces. I was up in MA last weekend and boy did we have some snow. On Saturday we went out snowshoeing, and I brought the F6, 58 and 24mm lenses. I did some auto bracketing (auto bracketing is WONDERFUL for chromes, after coming from an M4 here) so I'll be able to see the cameras pick, and then hopefully a salvageable exposure on either end if it got it wrong.

My goal is to integrate the F6 into more of my wedding work. 645 has really been the staple film wedding format for the last few years, and for pretty good reasons. But with 220 gone, Contax 645 prices through the roof, it's a harder sell for me. I always prefered 6x6 and 6x7 for MF medium format anyways. I personally think the Nikkor 58/1.4G is a good stand in for the Contax 80/2. Both were made to prioritize wide open rendering and 3D subjects (i.e. real people). If I can get 36 exposures, fast loading, AF that works, and decent detail from Portra films in 35mm I think it will be a great replacement for 220. Just have to test-test-test.

The F6 is amazing! Do Nikon a favor and get one.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Congratulations. Enjoy it.
 

mweintraub

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
1,725
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Medium Format
I went from the N80 to F100 w/F80s to F5 to F6. Sold all with each step except the F80s which has the exposure data imprinting between frames, but sold that when I got the F6 since it had it. Love the F6. Not sure the focus motor is as fast as the F5, but damn, it's not NOT fast. Wish I still had my 50mm 1.8D when I got the F6 to test it.

Someone's test of the F5's speed:
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
I my have a problem or may be too sensitive to some mini things but I prefer my old F100 and F5 over the F6. But I never use any of those as I always favor my mechanical rangefinders. I'm allergic to plastic and to SLR viewing in general.
 

lpt10

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
25
Location
Milky Way
Format
Med. Format RF
Ok, well I found an "open box" F6, and the shop cut me a deal, so I paid roughly what the grey market ones go for. But still, it was on roll 0. And now it has a 3 year warranty with Nikon!

My impressions? Well it's exceeding my expectations. Personally I thought the old D2H AF system would show it's rear in ways my D750s AF doesn't. I'm pleasantly surprised at how good it is. I also though the AF spread would be constricting, considering it was designed for crop. Not so, the spread is great! The rule of 3rds points are pretty much right where I want them. That old 5 point system in my F100 feels antiquated. It's faster than the F100 for sure. Faster than the F5? Idk, I don't have one on hand. Personally I think the F5 is a non starter due to it's size. I'll take the better accuracy and point spread over raw speed anyways.

Am I wrong that the screen shows nearly F2 depth of field? I'd swear that it does. It's a fabulous finder. I installed a DK-17M and I can still see out to the edges. I have 4 rolls to pick up tonight (Provia, Velvia, and 400H), and if the focus system is as good as I think, I'll probably go back to the standard finder for the slightly better eye relief.

We have all these absurdly sharp lenses now. I'm using the Sigma 24/1.4, 35/1.4, and Nikon 58mm 1.4G. These three lenses are my basic wedding kit. I can't wait to see chromes from these lenses, particularly the 58mm. AND, given the data imprint system, if the 58mm is giving me trouble at 1.4 focus-wise, I'll know from the frame instead of trying to remember.

I also put the metering system through it's paces. I was up in MA last weekend and boy did we have some snow. On Saturday we went out snowshoeing, and I brought the F6, 58 and 24mm lenses. I did some auto bracketing (auto bracketing is WONDERFUL for chromes, after coming from an M4 here) so I'll be able to see the cameras pick, and then hopefully a salvageable exposure on either end if it got it wrong.

My goal is to integrate the F6 into more of my wedding work. 645 has really been the staple film wedding format for the last few years, and for pretty good reasons. But with 220 gone, Contax 645 prices through the roof, it's a harder sell for me. I always prefered 6x6 and 6x7 for MF medium format anyways. I personally think the Nikkor 58/1.4G is a good stand in for the Contax 80/2. Both were made to prioritize wide open rendering and 3D subjects (i.e. real people). If I can get 36 exposures, fast loading, AF that works, and decent detail from Portra films in 35mm I think it will be a great replacement for 220. Just have to test-test-test.

The F6 is amazing! Do Nikon a favor and get one.

It would be great if you could post some shots. Probably i'm not the only one wondering about the kind of results one can get with the F6 and modern glass.
Cheers
 

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
I have said this, repeatedly: to me, at least, there is little as satisfying as technology that has had all the bugs removed. Too often, in our throw-away culture, we miss the veracity of that statement. Sperdynamite is enjoying the best of the best that photography has evolved into. - David Lyga
 

Fordmondeo

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
45
Location
England
Format
Medium Format
Sperdynamite.
I just bought an awesome Hasselblad but now I'm jealous of you.
Not fair!
 
OP
OP
NortheastPhotographic
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
1,507
Location
Maine!
Format
Medium Format
I will definitely link to some shots! I am writing a review of a film scanner right now for a blog, and it should be posted sometime soon-ish. I have it mostly written I'm just accumulating scans right now. That'll have the most recent stuff I've shot with the F6.

But from looking at the 3 rolls chrome and 1 roll of 400H I can say that the AF is amazing. My fears of it not being able to focus the 58mm 1.4 have been pretty much completely asuaged. Perhaps what they say about how the combination of film thickness and imperfect flatness (vs a sensor) really does mitigate the need for in camera AF fine tune. OTOH I'm glad I was able to calibrate my Sigma lenses with their dongle. The 24/1.4 ART is very sharp, and the 58mm 1.4 G still exudes character.

Something I'm working on for my review is sort of a rough idea I'm working out about how we should stop doing comparisons for the most part. Like, I look at these chromes, and I don't see any need for any more detail based on what they are. Sure there is grain, but they actually aren't revealing any less about a specific scene that a D750 would. The idea, the mood, the requisite detail is all captured very clearly. I would and probably will shoot nearly all my travel and reportage work with the F6 and not feel that I'm missing out on anything. Now I just need to work it into my portrait photography. I'm not expecting it to be as good as 645, but it needs to either have an aesthetic all it's own or be acceptable. From what I see here I'm feeling confident.

If you want to see some work now, check out my instagram. I'm at @marksperry. I have 2 F6 images up, but it's mostly film anyway. More F6 images to come too!
 

Fordmondeo

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
45
Location
England
Format
Medium Format
I will definitely link to some shots! I am writing a review of a film scanner right now for a blog, and it should be posted sometime soon-ish. I have it mostly written I'm just accumulating scans right now. That'll have the most recent stuff I've shot with the F6.

But from looking at the 3 rolls chrome and 1 roll of 400H I can say that the AF is amazing. My fears of it not being able to focus the 58mm 1.4 have been pretty much completely asuaged. Perhaps what they say about how the combination of film thickness and imperfect flatness (vs a sensor) really does mitigate the need for in camera AF fine tune. OTOH I'm glad I was able to calibrate my Sigma lenses with their dongle. The 24/1.4 ART is very sharp, and the 58mm 1.4 G still exudes character.

Something I'm working on for my review is sort of a rough idea I'm working out about how we should stop doing comparisons for the most part. Like, I look at these chromes, and I don't see any need for any more detail based on what they are. Sure there is grain, but they actually aren't revealing any less about a specific scene that a D750 would. The idea, the mood, the requisite detail is all captured very clearly. I would and probably will shoot nearly all my travel and reportage work with the F6 and not feel that I'm missing out on anything. Now I just need to work it into my portrait photography. I'm not expecting it to be as good as 645, but it needs to either have an aesthetic all it's own or be acceptable. From what I see here I'm feeling confident.

If you want to see some work now, check out my instagram. I'm at @marksperry. I have 2 F6 images up, but it's mostly film anyway. More F6 images to come too!
Can you post a picture of the F6? Drool worthy.
 
OP
OP
NortheastPhotographic
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
1,507
Location
Maine!
Format
Medium Format
2.jpg
 

Odot

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
257
Location
Berlin
Format
Multi Format
(there was a url link here which no longer exists): could oyu please post some pics or links to anything film you have shot with the Sigma Art lenses? I am also planning on going that route :wink:
 
OP
OP
NortheastPhotographic
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
1,507
Location
Maine!
Format
Medium Format
Image 1 (3).jpg

This is what I happen to have on my phone.

24/1.4 ART - Provia 100F - F6

(there was a url link here which no longer exists): could oyu please post some pics or links to anything film you have shot with the Sigma Art lenses? I am also planning on going that route :wink:
 
Last edited:

etn

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,113
Location
Munich, Germany
Format
Medium Format
Congrats on the F6! Have fun with it.

Sperdynamite.
I just bought an awesome Hasselblad but now I'm jealous of you.
Not fair!
Been thinking about buying an F6 for, what, probably more than 10 years now. But every time I am going out with a 35mm, I realize I prefer to grab my rangefinder. Or if I don't mind the size, I use the Hasselblad. My ol' Nikon glass sees little use those days... shame, I know. (or only with "that other technology which shall not be named", an even bigger shame ha ha!) You guys convinced me to load a roll into my old F90x with ugly, sticky back. Thanks :smile:
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
It's nice to see that the F6 is still listed among film cameras on Nikon's website.

A few years ago, I heard that some people who bought F6's had "thank you" cards inside the box from the person who built the camera. Although I've not been tempted by any pro Nikon beyond the F4, if I knew such a card was in an F6 box, I'd buy the camera.
 

TheToadMen

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
I got a F6 last year (2nd hand) and I love it too.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
Aaaaahhh! here's another grandpa.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9033.JPG
    IMG_9033.JPG
    667.3 KB · Views: 232

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Let's see...

...I think I have an F6 around here somewhere.

Is this it?

IMAG7105-1.jpg



...nope.
 

David Heintz

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
15
Location
Chesterfield
Format
35mm
Congratulations! I have spent a few months seeking absolutely new-in-the-box Nikon film cameras, and have come up with the following: FM3A, F100, F5 Anniversary, F6. The FM3A and the F6 are my favorites. If you can, try the extra battery holder with the F6. Yes, it becomes bigger, heavier, but those 8 batteries add shelf life and you get the vertical grip.

Note to F100 fans: great camera also, except 1. no aperture indicator in the viewfinder, and 2. no opportunity to set nonCPU lenses, which is surprising, as the camera does have custom user settings for a lot of things...
 

TheToadMen

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
Congratulations! I have spent a few months seeking absolutely new-in-the-box Nikon film cameras, and have come up with the following: FM3A, F100, F5 Anniversary, F6. The FM3A and the F6 are my favorites. If you can, try the extra battery holder with the F6. Yes, it becomes bigger, heavier, but those 8 batteries add shelf life and you get the vertical grip.

Note to F100 fans: great camera also, except 1. no aperture indicator in the viewfinder, and 2. no opportunity to set nonCPU lenses, which is surprising, as the camera does have custom user settings for a lot of things...

I agree, the FM3a is also a wonderful camera - especially with the 40/2.8p lens that came out with this camera.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom