The visual peculiarities in these last two examples of interiors aren't so much from using front rise as simply from using a very wide angle lens. Depending on the subject, the rendition of perspective can seem disturbing -- close objects off axis can seem too large, and spheres will render as ellipses -- the lights in the upper left corner of the second photo are examples of both effects. (Many photographers call these effects "distortion", though that isn't really the correct usage of the word -- the word "distortion" is properly used for a lens that renders straight lines in the scene as curved lines in the photograph. either barrel or pincushion, depending on the direction of the curvature.) The cause of the exaggerated sizes and shapes changes for both wide-angle and long focus lenses is that we are not viewing the prints at the optical center that would replicate the taking conditions. If you could place your eye much closer to these images and still focus they would look more natural.
Possible solutions to these problems are: a camera position farther away from all subject elements, or a camera position in which the corners (and edges even) don't have close elements, or simply a longer lens that shows less of the scene. If no better camera position is possible and you must show all the subject elements, then you will just have to use a very wide lens and accept the "distortions".
For the photo with the lights (of what appears to be an office, not a restaurant), if you had used less front rise, then the near floor might have loomed larger. It probably would have looked less peculiar than way the lights and ceiling now appear, but more boring. Given that there wasn't a better camera position, the best solution might be to crop and show less.
