How would Galen Rowell have taken this photo?

No Hall

No Hall

  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 87
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 2
  • 1
  • 119
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 2
  • 0
  • 69
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,782
Messages
2,780,786
Members
99,703
Latest member
heartlesstwyla
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
I can't put my finger on it, but something feels "wrong" about that photo. There are many elements I like about it, but as an whole something just feels off.

It's called "Velvia".
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
No, this is way beyond Velvia. The technical term is too much Fauxto$hop.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Many times in various forums I've read of Galen Rowell, but this is the first time I've looked at his work. I know a lot of people like his work, but I don't like it at all: for me it's too saturated, too much dynamic range, too much like a "velvet Elvis" at the Saturday morning craft show.

Not surprisingly, much of what Ken Rockwell has in his photo gallery emulates this; another fan of over-saturation.

A former co-worker of mine, Mr. I'll Never Go Back To Film, will take perfectly exposed photos with his D800 and turn them into photos like this because he thinks that's what one is supposed to do.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,079
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Theo -- I do not believe any of his images printed while he was alive is of the Velveeta quality. That all came after his death.
 

jimjm

Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,226
Location
San Diego CA
Format
Multi Format
Theo -- I do not believe any of his images printed while he was alive is of the Velveeta quality. That all came after his death.

I agree. I have some of his books (published while he was alive) and whily many of the images are typical Velvia color, nothing near the saturation seen in the examples online now.

Unfortunately, I believe the general public these days has come to expect oversaturated/HDR images and the folks selling/producing them use this as a way to increase sales. Sort of like candy, really appealing at first but you quickly become sick from the excessive sugar.

In terms of outdoor and landscape photography, his techniques and content/composition have always been a favorite of mine.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,301
Format
4x5 Format
I posted a couple photos to the galleries to illustrate the discussion...

Grassy Edge of Dusy Basin and Thunderstorm Brewing Over LeConte Canyon are my idea of what Galen Rowell's Stormy sunset over Evolution Lake would look like if you took away the Velvia and the Neutral Density Grad filter.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Theo -- I do not believe any of his images printed while he was alive is of the Velveeta quality. That all came after his death.

I agree. I have some of his books (published while he was alive) and whily many of the images are typical Velvia color, nothing near the saturation seen in the examples online now.

Oh - I did not realize that. Who or what entity has the rights to his images? How are they allowed to reprint them in that manner? I cringe at the thought of an overprocessed colorized version of AA's Moonrise
 
OP
OP

tomfrh

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
653
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Medium Format
I have a Galen Rowell picture book (Retrospective), and most of the shots are 20, 30, 40 years ago. They are a lot more natural looking, and I am guessing are mostly Kodachrome shots. The latter images, the late 90s and early 2000s are the syrupy velvia shots. I read that this is how he was producing these final images, as was the style of the time. e.g. http://landscapephotographyblogger.com/did-velvia-film-change-landscape-photography. As such his final work was frozen in this style, which other photographers moved away from in the years after his death.

However some of you are saying these are modifications were done *after* he died?
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
I have a Galen Rowell picture book (Retrospective), and most of the shots are 20, 30, 40 years ago. They are a lot more natural looking, and I am guessing are mostly Kodachrome shots. The latter images, the late 90s and early 2000s are the syrupy velvia shots. I read that this is how he was producing these final images, as was the style of the time. e.g. http://landscapephotographyblogger.com/did-velvia-film-change-landscape-photography. As such his final work was frozen in this style, which other photographers moved away from in the years after his death.

However some of you are saying these are modifications were done *after* he died?

Yes, it seems the way his photos are shown now are a bit more saturated and punchy post-mortem but that likely is because it's what sells. His latest and perhaps considered his greatest period was the 10-15 years before his death. He wrote an article or chapter about his discovery of Velvia in the early 90's and how it fit his vision better than anything before, and he always wrote of the special "alpenglow" light (a pinkish/reddish/orangish hue) that he claimed he only found in the California Sierras and South America, so punchy and colorful was his purpose and end-game though perhaps not as much as how his images are presented or seen on iPhones and monitors these days.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Many times in various forums I've read of Galen Rowell, but this is the first time I've looked at his work. I know a lot of people like his work, but I don't like it at all: for me it's too saturated, too much dynamic range, too much like a "velvet Elvis" at the Saturday morning craft show.

Not surprisingly, much of what Ken Rockwell has in his photo gallery emulates this; another fan of over-saturation.

A former co-worker of mine, Mr. I'll Never Go Back To Film, will take perfectly exposed photos with his D800 and turn them into photos like this because he thinks that's what one is supposed to do.

The over saturation, the over sharpening, expanded dynamic range, ... plus the removal or addition to subject matter in images are the reasons that I take such a strong stand against digisnapping and fauxto$hopping.

Below is another reason:

Hoax.PNG
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,079
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
...However some of you are saying these are modifications were done *after* he died?

I will ammend my statement to, when I visited the gallery in Bishop, I looked at all his his work being shown, and my impression based on the vintage prints and the newly printed images I saw, was that none of the vintage work showed any signs of over-sharpening and high saturation of the colors.

He died in 2002. Perhaps if he was still alive he would be printing in the Velveeta vein himself.
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Whoever is making these prints IMO is going into LAB mode in PS and really twisting the A B channels. The image posted is definitely worked on in PS.
No, this is way beyond Velvia. The technical term is too much Fauxto$hop.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom