How Was it With the rolleifex's?

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 4
  • 0
  • 53
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 8
  • 0
  • 58
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 2
  • 2
  • 51
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 4
  • 1
  • 55

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,940
Messages
2,783,556
Members
99,754
Latest member
AndyAnglesey
Recent bookmarks
0

Flyfishdk

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
32
Location
Denmark
Format
35mm
Hi There

After i This week Got at really nice rolleiflex 2.8F xenotar and have falled in love With it allready. The way to shoot With it, the look and specially the mechanics. I have also been reading about the history anddevelopement of it, but i can't find out how they where rated back in the days. Where the expensive? Was it the top?

Please tell me as much as you know :smile:
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
Expensive yes, the top, yes! It was the work horse of professional photographers for many, many years. Other's will have more info than me...
 

jp498

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,525
Location
Owls Head ME
Format
Multi Format
Judging by how much rolleiflex has been copied, it must have been quite something. And when walking around with a yashica tlr, I am often asked if that is a rolleiflex.

Made me get thinking... we treat new cameras differently now. Now we purchase new cameras as things that will be good for a couple years and then something with more bells and whistles or faster or better will certainly replace it. If it's not rugged no big deal, worst case it has to last it's warranty, best case it has to last till you get compelled to upgrade for more megapixel or better battery. in the 80's the first camera I bought by myself was a piece of junk and I went upmarket and bought a high end camera and have used it for 20+ years. People bought high end because they'd figure it would last forever and do everything with minor care and didn't think about digital turning the camera business into essentially the computer business.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,316
Format
4x5 Format
I had one of the early Rolleiflexes and it already had the crank winder on the side. The scratched, uncoated lenses gave me too much flare for my taste so I dismantled it. The lens stage was built on four geared helicals.
 
OP
OP

Flyfishdk

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
32
Location
Denmark
Format
35mm
Very interesting thinking. I work as a photojournalist and have the "normal" of approach to my digital gear where I allways think about the next upgrade... it puts the whole thing in relief when getting a maybe 40 year old camera there just perform really outstanding and the build quality is so good.... maybe it's not that important at all.

What was the price for a new rolleiflex like my 2.8F xenotar? was it so expensive that it was only pros that used it or???

Best regards

Nicolai

Judging by how much rolleiflex has been copied, it must have been quite something. And when walking around with a yashica tlr, I am often asked if that is a rolleiflex.

Made me get thinking... we treat new cameras differently now. Now we purchase new cameras as things that will be good for a couple years and then something with more bells and whistles or faster or better will certainly replace it. If it's not rugged no big deal, worst case it has to last it's warranty, best case it has to last till you get compelled to upgrade for more megapixel or better battery. in the 80's the first camera I bought by myself was a piece of junk and I went upmarket and bought a high end camera and have used it for 20+ years. People bought high end because they'd figure it would last forever and do everything with minor care and didn't think about digital turning the camera business into essentially the computer business.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,266
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
You need to look at what cameras were in use before the introduction of the Rolleiflex, the closest competitors were the reflex cameras from companies like Mentor, APM (Thornton Pickard) Soho Relfex, Graflex, Newman and Guardia etc, all essentially plate cameras although film packs and roll film backs could be used.

So while the Rolleiflex was 6x6 as opposed to 6x7/6x9 it was very much faster to use, the reflexes had non returning mirrors were slow to use, fiddly shutters to set, you needed to open the lens for focussing, and much larger & heavier.

Ian
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,093
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
My aunt bought my dad a 3.5 MX-EVS back in the mid 50's at a PX in Spain when my uncle was stationed there -- $200 if I got the story right. I still have it but it took a fall and is no longer operational.. I use an early 2.8F now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

R gould

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
427
Location
Jersey Chann
Format
Medium Format
I have got 2 rolleis, a flex automat 4 and a cord VA2 the rolleiflex was a workhorse, with a little bit of care they will last forever, they are my go to cameras,light to carry, easy and quick to focus and use, I couldn't get along without them now, I have other cameras for MF that I use and love, including another tlr, and all my cameras are at least 50 yrs old or older, but it is the rolleis that I use the most,the negatives that I get from them have what I can only describe as a glow, they are the leica's of the older MF world,Richard:smile:
 

Pumalite

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
1,078
Location
Here & Now
Format
Multi Format
DSC01169.jpg

I love them
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,891
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Flyfishdk, if you have the time to sort through the archive, here's a collection of discussions among some Rolleiflex addicts:
http://www.freelists.org/archive/rollei_list/
The topics roam widely and the responses can go in strange directions, but there is a lot of information buried in there, and references to many sources.

It is an active list so you could ask questions, get resources, etc. As with any such group, spend time searching, and get a feel for current members before jumping in. They do answer; I was recently given a Rolleiflex 2.8A Tessar and they provided some nice details about the history.
 

artonpaper

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
336
Location
Staten Island, New York
Format
Multi Format
I used a Rollei back in the 60s, 70s, and into the 80s. The model with the Ziess Planar was said to be even sharper than the Hasselblad, due to the fact that the Rollei had a film pressure plate and the Hasseblad didn't. With the newly available electronic flash units like Ultrablitz, they became THE camera to use for reportage and events photography. And of course in fashion and other creative photography. I believe both Avedon and Penn used them when using medium format.
 

Crashbox

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
69
Location
Lynden, Wars
Format
Multi Format
I don't see anyone with their Rollei's inverted in that photo- IMO that is one big advantage of a waist-level finder, turning the camera upside-down and shooting over everyone else... maybe I'm just over-analyzing it :wink:

ETA: Yeah, the subject IS elevated, aren't they...?
 

graywolf

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
166
Location
Boone, North
Format
Multi Format
What was the price for a new rolleiflex like my 2.8F xenotar? was it so expensive that it was only pros that used it or???

As I remember, back circa 1961, all the pro grade cameras cost about the same ($375), except the Hasselbald ($550). That was list which is what you paid if you did not live in NYC. That included the Linhof Super Technika, Leica M3, Nikon F & SP, Canon 7S, Rolleiflex F, etc. I bought a Pentax H3 ($199) because that was what I could afford. BTW, there was a hefty US import duty on them back then, so GI's overseas got a real deal on them. That was the days before credit cards, so you either had to find a dealer that would finance it, or save up the cash. Things were different back then.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
Is that fellow in the center of the pack giving an avian salute??

:eek:

Ken
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom