Don't do us, photographic history or Kodak any favors.
You know, don't shoot it if you don't really want to. I mean really, this is getting stupid. If you want to shoot a few rolls a month, go for it, if you don't, stop complaining about how much it costs when you could be wasting far more money guzzling beer or other things and having nothing in return, nothing to look at 10, 20 even 50 years from now.
You either see the value in shooting it or you don't, plain and simple. Think about all the money that is wasted in stupid things like cable TV, bad meals, bad investments, trips to Vegas, losing lottery tickets and a huge list of other things that are far worse than trying your luck with Kodadchrome.
If you can't see the value in shooting this film, then you can't see it and that does not make you bad or wrong. But that does not mean that other people can't see the value. And if you think E6 is so much better, lets see what you can do with it then:
Come on now, show me those images that put Steve McCurry, Sam Abell, Alex Webb, Ernst Haas, David Alan Harvey, James Stanfield, Galen Rowell or Bill Allard to shame...I am all eyes folks so show me the goods, cause this I gotta see!
I have a feeling that for all the people complaining about the film, there is a bigger problem for them at hand. Lets just say they are complaining about the horses pulling the cart they are in when it has no wheels.
By the way, I am not trying to save Kodachrome, I am just trying to see to it that it does not go quietly. I hate to tell you naysayers, but it is working...