Tetenal, once again.
Larry,
once again me. ;->
"]I did not find this in my own experience. I had Agfa MCC, Ilford Multigrade IV, and Tetenal VCC in my Paris darkroom."
Are you absolutely sure you didn´t mistake them and that you used VCC, not VCU?
" The Agfra and Tetenal were indistinguishable in thickness, emulsion tone, base color, and printing times; the Ilford Multigrade was colder in both emulsion and base color, and the printing times were considerably different. I use the split filter technique, and I always had to give the Ilford paper much more Magenta than yellow, while the Agfa and Tetenal times for each filter were much closer."
Not at all. Look at the manual at
http://tetenal.de/down_de/photo/tech_sw_photopapiere.pdf
(sorry, no english available) and compare the filter values of the papers - the values given for VCM are identical to the last digit to those I found in Ilford´s specs for Multigrade IV.
I limit it to the Durst values to keep it short:
VCC:
Filter 00 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5
Durst 150Y 90Y 70Y 55Y 30Y ohne Filter 20M 45M 65M 100M 140M 170M
Ilford:
150Y 90Y 70Y 55Y 30Y 0 20M 45M 65M 100M 140M 170m
VCU:
Filter 0 1 2 3 4 5
Durst 60Y 30Y ohne Filter 30M 70M 130M
Agfa table in
http://agfaphoto.com/broschure-pdf/professional/PSD1e.pdf including intermediate values:
60 Y 45 Y 30 Y 10 Y — 20 M 30 M 50 M 70 M 100 M 130 M
"If it is true that Tetenal is now also using Ilford stock, I still think it's been a fairly recent development."
It is true. I am using MG/VCC since 1997 and VCU shortly at that time, too. And I know they are selling it since 1995 or 1996.
"Either that, or they sold their Agfa stock in France and their Ilford stock in Germany, or something like that."
Hardly.
