How reliable is the film clip fixer clearing test?

OP
OP

runswithsizzers

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
1,772
Location
SW Missouri, USA
Format
Multi Format
When you say "Other products differ." I am guessing you mean developer chemistry, right?

I'm pretty sure not many customers would pay full retail price for developing chemistry if they knew it was almost 2 years older than the manufacturer's recommended shelf life.

So who really benefits from hiding the age of the product from the consumer? The retailer makes a little extra profit by selling a product that would otherwise be difficult to sell. But in the long run, is that good for the future of film photography?

Some consumers are going to take the expired develper home and use it with no problems. Everybody is happy!

Some consumers are going to ask the manufacturer to check the batch code and reveal the age of the product. They may or may not get a refund or replacement product - but either way, the customer is inconvenienced, and confidence in the manufacturer and/or retailer will suffer.

Some customers are going notice the developer looks or smells funny. see above

And some customers are going to use the expired developer, and get poor results. Because it is often difficult to determine which part of the developing process caused the poor results, those consumers may get frustrated and decide film photography is just not worth the hassle. Score one for digital.

Rather than hiding the expiration date so the product can be sold at full retail price - the retailers would be better off to put short-date products on sale at discounted prices. They would make less profit, but they should have more satisfied customers in the long run. If a customer makes the choice to buy an out-of-date product to save money, they have only themself to blame if something goes wrong. That is different from a customer who feels they were tricked into unknowingly buying expired products.
 

Terryro

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
27
Location
Texas United states
Format
Multi Format

Thanks for the information. I wasn't familiar with the Selenium test. Very good info. I've always used the clip test and doubled the clearing time until it's more than 4 minutes. Tossed if that happens.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,249
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Retailers should be managing their inventory and, if they are reputable, pulling things like developer out of inventory if they have had them on the shelf for years.
The problem with date codes is that customers keep shoving the older stock to the back of the shelf and buying the newer stock instead, even when the viability of the older stock is essentially the same as the newer stock. The more that happens, the greater the likelihood that perfectly usable inventory becomes problematic.
It isn't like milk - fixer lasts for years!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

But it is still called hypo test. It states it right on the bottle, whether or not it is technically incorrect.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,249
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
But it is still called hypo test. It states it right on the bottle, whether or not it is technically incorrect.

Are you sure you are using the right bottle? A bottle of (residual) "hypo" test can also be purchased.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,596
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
But it is still called hypo test. It states it right on the bottle, whether or not it is technically incorrect.
Sirius,

There is a "hypo" test, but it is not a test for residual silver. It is the HT-2 test for residual hypo and tests for residual fixer and fixer by-products in the material being tested, not residual silver. It is, therefore a test for adequate washing, not adequate fixation.

Are you sure that is not what you are referring to?

Kodak® Hypo Test Solution HT-2
Distilled Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 750 ml
28% Acetic Acid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125 ml
Silver Nitrate, Crystals . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5 g
Distilled Water to Make . . . . . . . . . . .1 l
(Store in a tightly sealed brown glass bottle away from strong light sources. This solution stains everything it touches, so don’t splash it around.)

To use for paper, place one drop on the border of the print, let it stand for 2 minutes, then rinse with water. If the print is thoroughly washed the solution will produce only a very faint tea-colored stain, or possibly no stain at all. If it is inadequately washed, the solution will produce a rather dark tea-colored stain. To judge the stains accurately you should purchase a Kodak® Hypo Estimator, which costs about $3.

To use for film, cut off a small piece of film and drop it into the test solution for 3 minutes. Properly washed films should show virtually no discoloration.

Photographer's Formulary sells both the HT-2 and ST-1 tests rebadged as their own products.

Best,

Doremus
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,596
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
Thanks for the information. I wasn't familiar with the Selenium test. Very good info. I've always used the clip test and doubled the clearing time until it's more than 4 minutes. Tossed if that happens.
Be aware that the film-clearing test has two functions. One is to determine if the fixer is still active and fresh enough to fix film adequately. For this, one needs to establish a baseline by testing a given film in fresh fixer and find the clearing time. Then as the fixer is being used, tests are made to see how the clearing time increases. When the clearing time doubles, or approaches twice that of fresh fixer, it means the fixer is exhausted and should be discarded and replaced.

The second function of the clearing test is to determine minimum fixing time for a given film/fixer combination. The fixing time should be at least twice the clearing time, which varies with the degree of exhaustion of the fixer. The film-fixing time for almost-exhausted fixer then would be 4x the time in fresh fixer (2x the clearing time for almost exhausted fixer doubled again to get the minimum fixing time).

When I fix film, I simply do a clip test in fresh fixer and multiply the time by 4 and then add a bit of a safety factor. It doesn't hurt film a bit to be fixed longer than the minimum time as long as you aren't letting it sit for a really, really long time. Then I don't have to do a clip test to find my fixing time for every batch, just test when the fixer is approaching exhaustion to make sure I discard it in time.

When I'm developing large batches of film, I use two-bath fixation. Not only is it more economical, but it ensures that everything gets fixed to the highest standard. I clip-test bath one and then replace it with bath two when the clearing time reaches twice that for fresh fixer. The second bath is then promoted to bath one and a new bath two is mixed. Exactly the same procedure as for prints.

Best,

Doremus
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…