How much editing is justified?

Heavy editing (analog or digital) on an image is...

  • ...required to bring out the hidden diamond; not doing it demonstrates inexcusable incompetence

  • ...OK if you think it helps

  • ...not a great idea; show some restraint

  • ...an abomination and you should be hanged, drawn and quartered for even suggesting it


Results are only viewable after voting.

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,994
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
@loccdor - a question, just because I'm curious. Why didn't you step between the two cars in the original image to get closer to what you wanted? Were you on a bike?
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,192
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
If I got this right, basically you are saying a good photo should jump off the contact sheet and hit you in the eye.

No amount of editing is going to save a poorly conceived image. It might make it a little more pleasing to look at, though. And some creative editing might even successfully turn the source material into a whole new image not originally realized.

But at what point does the performance* itself become editing? Or does it ever? Or does it always? Or does editing start with act of seeing?

I will do all the 'editing' needed to create the image I want, be it zero or a ton.

* The classic "the negative is the score..." thing.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,192
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Nice catch! For me, cropping down to the top of the house to get rid of a lot of that blue sky lets my eyes connect and equate the blue of the car and the posts easier. You nicely cropped out most of the competing baby blue on the left side.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…