How many 4th layer fuji films were there?

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 2
  • 0
  • 87
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 131
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 126

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,748
Messages
2,780,357
Members
99,697
Latest member
Fedia
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
804
Location
Michigan, United States
Format
Multi Format
for some time now, I've been crossing some c41 films in e6, and generally, they largely preserve the orange base and give some other muted tones. however... I've found that the (few) fuji 4th color layer films I've done produce a different result- they're more blue green. So I'm wondering, how many 4th layer films did fuji make? I'd like to try them, see how they compare.

2019- 2007 expired superia 400, iso 50, plus two stops in e6
x1.jpeg

2020- 2005 expired (but frozen kept) fuji pro 160 nps, iso 40, plus two stops in e6
x2.jpeg
 

Ernst-Jan

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Messages
558
Location
NL
Format
Medium Format
Pro 160NS/160S, Pro 160C, Pro 400H, Pro 800Z
Fuji Superia 400 and 1600.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,519
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
Last edited:

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,519
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
Also, do Fuji super hg films have the extra layer?

As far as I know it was Fuji Super HG II 200 that had the 4th layer (not Super HG 200) but Super HG 400 had the 4th layer as well. (Of course I stand to be corrected)

IIRC a lot of this happened in the 1990s when competition between the brands was fierce.

Fuji had Super G, Super G+, Super HG, Super HG II all around this period.(1990s)
Some of the Kodak Gold had up to 5 or 6 different variants during the same decade.
Konica had Super HR, Super SR, Super XG, VX, VX Super, Centuria in a similar time frame.
I think Agfa just had XRG, HDC+.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,357
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The fourth layer is useful for having artificial light to appear as color balanced. Since I do not tend to photograph indoors with or without a strobe, I use Kodak Portra instead.
 

Mick Fagan

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
4,421
Location
Melbourne Au
Format
Multi Format
As Benjiboy says, Fuji Reala. If you can get some of the original four layer film, you will notice a slight difference to the subsequent offerings from Fuji.

I used it from the month it was released, mainly for mixed lighting including sodium lighting mixed with Tungsten and the results were mind bending in how good it was.

One or two friends also tried it through E6 chemistry and were very happy with the results, one shot E6 was the best and most consistent. Running C41 film through an E6 bath really stuffed it up, not to mention that consistency was woeful if going through an E6 bath that already had some C41 through it.

I still have around 10-15 rolls of original Fuji Reala. :D

Mick.
 
OP
OP
TheGreatGasMaskMan
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
804
Location
Michigan, United States
Format
Multi Format
As Benjiboy says, Fuji Reala. If you can get some of the original four layer film, you will notice a slight difference to the subsequent offerings from Fuji.

I used it from the month it was released, mainly for mixed lighting including sodium lighting mixed with Tungsten and the results were mind bending in how good it was.

One or two friends also tried it through E6 chemistry and were very happy with the results, one shot E6 was the best and most consistent. Running C41 film through an E6 bath really stuffed it up, not to mention that consistency was woeful if going through an E6 bath that already had some C41 through it.

I still have around 10-15 rolls of original Fuji Reala. :D

Mick.
I use a lab for e6, so I'm not super concerned about chemicals lasting.

and I did get my hands on one Reala a year ago and had it processed normally, but I have to say it was pretty nice
x3.jpeg
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,519
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
I think it was also/mostly aimed at improving color rendition under fluorescents.

+1.
I shot Reala for weddings, in the 1990's because it reproduced great colour and I had no complaints about the bridesmaid's dresses,
I also shot a lot of work for a local factory that produced medical devices. The interiors were always light by fluorescent lighting. I used to use fill flash for the foreground subjects and let Reala take care of the background lighting.
Because your eye sees the correct colour in the foreground, the background, even though slightly warmer in colour, wasn't noticed. If any other film was used the background looked a horrible green.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom