How long do you use your developer?

Photo Fitz

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2005
Messages
9
Location
Arizona
Format
Med. Format RF
Hello,

I use a batch of developer, Clayton F76+, for up to 8 rolls of film.

A friend said he makes a new batch of developer for each tank, 2-3 rolls, of film.

What is recommended?

- Alan
 

Akki14

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
London, UK
Format
4x5 Format
I use one-shot film developer,fotospeed's FD10 usually, so it always goes down the drain after developing time is up. That'd be a bit over 500ml for 2 rolls of 35mm or 1roll of 120 film (although I'm now considering the two rolls of 120 film in one spool trick).
 
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted

MikeSeb

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,104
Location
Denver, CO
Format
Medium Format
Add me to the one-shot crowd. Anything else is false economy, unless you are developing film on an industrial scale.

Why risk images you (presumably) were at some pains to make merely to save a few cents?
 

KenM

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2003
Messages
800
Location
Calgary, Alb
Format
4x5 Format
It really depends on the developer.

When I used to use Pyrocat-HD, I would only run a single batch of film (6 sheets) through a 1/2 gallon tank. The developer oxidizes fairly quickly, so it needs to be replaced after a relatively short period of time. It's pennies per batch, so it's no big deal.

However, with HC110, I'll run through 3 batches of film (18 sheets) in a 1/2 gallon tank at a slightly higher dilution than Dilution E (which is 1:11). Kodak states that the capacity of Dil E in a gallon tank is 10 sheets of 8x10, or 40 sheets of 4x5. A 1700ml dilution is a bit less than 1/2 a gallon, so 18 sheets is right at the border line. However, I've never had a problem, and I've been using this technique for the past 4 years.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
I use Pyrocat-HD and Pyrocat-MC and I use them as one-shot. I want consistent, reproduceable results so I do not reuse my film developer.

I do replenish and reuse my (Amidol) Paper developer.
 

Bill Mobbs

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
156
Format
Multi Format
I use a number of different film developers... Always one shot for film... Both developer and fixer. For paper I reuse developer and fixer. I can always make a new print. This is not so with the negative!
 

DrPablo

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
814
Location
North Caroli
Format
Multi Format
I've ben using XTOL at 1:1 for as much as 20 to 30 4x5 sheets, or the equivalent in 120 rolls.

Now that I'm shooting 8x10, I only process around 5 to 10 sheets before making it fresh, which basically means fresh development every time.

I've found that my contrast is easier to control (predictably) with fresh developer.
 

mjs

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Messages
1,123
Location
Elkhart, Ind
Format
Multi Format
Saving partially used developer is a false economy, as others have noted. In some cases (Tmax films in D76, for example,) it only works consistantly and repeatedly with fresh developer so saving it is high on the list of Bad Ideas.

Mike
 

Roger Hicks

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4,895
Location
Northern Aqu
Format
35mm RF
Dear Alan,

There are two routes to the maximum possible consistency.

One is to work one-shot.

The other is to use a fully 'seasoned' developer, i.e. one that is almost never pitched out, but is constantly replenished. This was how the commercial darkrooms of yore used to work, with the dev kept in 4-gallon tanks with a floating lid. When I started as an assistant in the 70s this was still normal.

The big disadvantage of a 'seasoned' developer is reduced film speed, typically 1 stop, because of bromide build-up. A lesser disadvantage is that if you're not careful they can accumulate crud. Apart from that, they're wonderfully reliable and consistent and very economical.

The compromise -- re-using dev for X rolls/square feet per gallon -- is nothing like as bad an idea as some people say: it works pretty well if you follow the guidelines for extending dev times to compensate for exhaustion and bromide build-up. As, presumably, you have found for yourself. There is little doubt, though, that one-shot is better.

Cheers,

R.
 

nicolai

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
190
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
I use Diafine, a two-bath, compensating developer that doesn't oxidise. I'm into year 3 with a $17.00 one-gallon kit.
 

Roger Hicks

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4,895
Location
Northern Aqu
Format
35mm RF
I use Diafine, a two-bath, compensating developer that doesn't oxidise. I'm into year 3 with a $17.00 one-gallon kit.
Dear Nicolai,

Sorry, I'd forgotten two-baths. You are quite right. They last half-way to forever and are very consistent too. I used them a lot, 25+ years ago, but gave up because I wasn't that keen on the tonality.

Cheers,

R.
 
OP
OP

Photo Fitz

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2005
Messages
9
Location
Arizona
Format
Med. Format RF
Thank you for the answers

I get it. Make new developer for eacgh small batch or risk bad results.

- Alan
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
I use mine long enough to do a roll of film. There are some advantages. If it only has to last a half hour or so, you can use formulas that would not last any longer and which might have qualities that cannot be had with those that must be kept and reused. Pyrocat HD, PC, or MC stocks mixed in a glycol have long storage life and are very flexible in use. A simple stock like PC-TEA allows experimenting with varying amounts of sulfite from 0 on up. You get the point.
 

bjorke

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
2,263
Location
SF sometimes
Format
Multi Format
It varies a little, but typically I use my developer for around 11 minutes at 20 degrees C
 

herb

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
405
Format
Medium Format
How long do you use your developer

Buy bulk chemicals, make your own concentrates, use the working

solution in one session and throw it out. You can make pryocat hd (etc)

quite economically.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Sorry, I'd forgotten two-baths. Cheers, R.

IMO, you did not forget. That Diafine is a Very 'seasoned'
two bath developer which could be kept in tanks.

Another basis for classifying developers for consistency,
besides method of use, is the chemical make-up of the
developer. Could go without saying save for some who
are new to photo chemistry and it's use but wonder
what is this 'consistency' thing. Dan
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
Always one shot: Pyrocat-P, Xtol 1:3, D-76 1:1

These I do use for a dozen rolls or so: Microphen and Split D-23. They are both special use developers for me so they often get shelf worn before I get all I could out of them. Since I mix my own from powder chemicals, it is not very expensive to toss them when there is any doubt. D-23 Bath A never seems to go bad, Bath B gets worn though.

If I developed film every day, I might be drawn to developers with replenishment - Since it is more like once a week or so, I feel more confident with the predictability of freshly mixed. I have no need to gamble with my negatives to save a few pennies on used developer. Pyrocat is really cheap to make, as are most developers when made from raw materials.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…