How Hard Should You 'Tap' Canister When Processing Film?

Branches

A
Branches

  • 2
  • 0
  • 23
St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 8
  • 2
  • 134
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 3
  • 4
  • 172
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 3
  • 3
  • 210

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,891
Messages
2,782,590
Members
99,740
Latest member
Mkaufman
Recent bookmarks
0

DF

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
583
How hard, and also how many taps? I've always been skeptical as to if this really does disperse/remove air bubbles, or if there's any point in it at all. In fact, I wonder if it has a disruptive effect in some way on the film running alongside the reels, if too hard tapping increases contrast for instance. There's this guy who after inversions - doesn't tap, instead gives one hard wack.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,996
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I tap-whack - on a folded cloth.
Not hard enough to threaten the tank, but not too gentle either.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,301
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Air bubbles are buoyant. Each time you tap/bump/bang the developing tank, you're momentarily subjecting it to hundreds of times the acceleration of gravity, which multiplies the force on each tiny bubble by hundreds of times as well -- which is what causes the bubbles to move away from any place they've adhered due to surface tension.

Clearly, you don't want to bang the tank so hard to break it (if plastic) or dent it (if steel), but otherwise, two or three sharp raps is about the same as one massive whack -- but safer, if you use a plastic tank.

Any sort of agitation increases contrast in comparison to none, because it ensures there's fresh(er) developer available at the surface of the emulsion, where without agitation, there's an opportunity for the developer to exhaust locally where there's more exposed halide to develop. There are no significant difference in density in the liquids with in the tank, however, so banging the tank does not, of itself, increase agitation effectiveness -- something needs to cause the liquid to move around in the tank, relative to the emulsino surface, to do that. Swirling (like cognac in a snifter), twirling with the swizzle stick, inversion, rocking (substitutes for inversion in some tank types), sliding back and forth (Kodak's method for hanger tanks) -- something that actually makes the developer move.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,972
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I always avoid tapping the tank if I am angry and turning green. Otherwise a couple of moderate but quite sharp taps of the plastic on a plastic surface seems to suffice

I did once employ a "tapper" as an assistant who was over enthusiastic. Thank goodness he eventually left the job to start on telegraph poles instead

pentaxuser
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
3 taps from a height of 3/4 inch on a paper towel folded in quarters... using the tank weight to control force. Generally only twice in the first minute and no tapping during agitation thereafter.
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
I never tapped, never had bubble issues. I like a good flick of the wrist when I agitate, so I suppose that counts for a tap.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,993
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Some of the tanks here have the foot worn completely away from over aggressive rapping. I could hear them banging their tanks on the counter from where I was sitting, in the ceramics room! It would make me cringe! Since I took over the photo program three years ago, I've been teaching my students to use the figure 8 agitation pattern. No bubbles. No need to rapping.
 

PFGS

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
282
Location
NC USA
Format
Digital
I just smack my steel tanks with the heel of my hand a few times, never had a bubble problem & unlikely to damage the tank or pop the top off.
 

PFGS

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
282
Location
NC USA
Format
Digital
Vaguely related question - why agitate at the start? The developer is fresh, why this prolonged agitation right up front? For me, usually a lot of that 30 seconds is taken up by filling the tank and I only get a few agitations in anyway.
 

Pentode

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2017
Messages
957
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Format
Multi Format
I just smack my steel tanks with the heel of my hand a few times, never had a bubble problem & unlikely to damage the tank or pop the top off.
That's what I do, too. Two thuds on the bottom of the tank - metal or plastic - with the heel of my hand. Not hard enough to hurt.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Vaguely related question - why agitate at the start? The developer is fresh, why this prolonged agitation right up front? For me, usually a lot of that 30 seconds is taken up by filling the tank and I only get a few agitations in anyway.
For me that first agitation is mostly to get rid of any bubbles. I start timing after the developer etc is poured.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,424
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Vaguely related question - why agitate at the start? The developer is fresh, why this prolonged agitation right up front? For me, usually a lot of that 30 seconds is taken up by filling the tank and I only get a few agitations in anyway.

The initial agitation helps to start even development and removes quite a bit of the anti-halation dye, if you don't pre-wash. What kind of tank are you using that takes nearly 30 secs to fill? I use 1L tanks, both stainless and Paterson, and can fill completely in 10 - 15 secs. You may want to think about starting the timer once the tank is filled; many folks do this. The procedure really isn't critical as long as you're consistent. Doing a pre-wash step will mitigate the need to worry so much about fill time because it takes the developer longer to seep into the emulsion.

Regarding tapping... I give a medium smack on the side of the tank once I set it down after an agitation cycle. Never had air bells.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,301
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Vaguely related question - why agitate at the start? The developer is fresh, why this prolonged agitation right up front? For me, usually a lot of that 30 seconds is taken up by filling the tank and I only get a few agitations in anyway.

For me that first agitation is mostly to get rid of any bubbles. I start timing after the developer etc is poured.

That agitation (first full minute or first 30 seconds, depending who taught you) is mainly to ensure the film is thoroughly and evenly wetted as early as possible after the developer goes in -- this helps avoid unevenness, surge marks, hesitation marks, and similar issues.

Speaking of which, if you have a tank that takes you most of thirty seconds to fill, get rid of it (or at least put it on the shelf) and get a Paterson. Pouring from a graduate (pitcher), I can fill a Paterson in under ten seconds, have the inversion cap on, timer started, and be agitating in fifteen. Then, at the end, I can pour out and shake the tank (to minimize carry-over) in about the same time. If your tank takes most of 30 seconds to fill, it'll take similar time to drain, and during the drain step, before and as you pour stop bath, you have developer on the emulsion oxidizing from high-area, low-volume contact with air in the tank; this can lead to staining with B&W, and odd color artifacts with color (because it's oxidation products that make the dyes).
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,084
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Our students were taught by the profs to whack the SS tank of the counter a couple times. I had to replace the counter once...even after putting out rubber pads to thump on. I thump on the heel of my hand a couple good times (SS tanks holding two 120 reels).
 

PFGS

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
282
Location
NC USA
Format
Digital
What kind of tank are you using that takes nearly 30 secs to fill?

Speaking of which, if you have a tank that takes you most of thirty seconds to fill, get rid of it (or at least put it on the shelf) and get a Paterson.

It's my one liter steel Kindermann with plastic lid & Hewes steel reels. It was already old when I got it in my very first load of yard sale darkroom junk 20 years ago and I've been using it (and the same lid on its 500ml brother) ever since, never once had any unevenness, staining, air bells, mis-loaded reel issues, tide lines, etc. It takes me about 20 seconds to fill because I pour in the developer with absolute neatness, not a droplet anywhere on the lid or outside the tank or on the counter or my hands, just a slow steady pour with the tank held at 45 degrees. Standardized early on on the sequence start timer - pour in - agitate - timer runs out - pour out, on the grounds that either way is arbitrary and best to be consistent. My exposure and dev time choices, and former excessive switching from one developer to the other, have been the only development-related issues I've ever had. I do avoid short dev times so maybe that helps.

I did try a Patterson once, hated loading the reels and the whole process was a big leaky mess, never again.

At least my hand-thumps are Photrio approved!
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,996
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
With respect to development, arguably, the initial agitation is at least as important as all the rest combined.
It is what ensures an even start to the development. I agitate continuously for the first 30 seconds.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,301
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I did try a Patterson once, hated loading the reels and the whole process was a big leaky mess, never again.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I've completely quit using my stainless tanks; once I'm sure I've found all of them, I'll probably put them up for sale. I can load a 35mm stainless reel without problems, as long as I have a counter top to roll it on (can NOT load one in a bag in under fifteen minutes, though, and 120 is much harder) -- but I've been completely spoiled by being able to pour into the Paterson funnel and be done in seconds. For me, the plastic reels with the little ratchet balls are far easier (as long as they're clean and dry). Just a couple hours ago, I loaded a roll of 35mm into a Paterson reel while my biscuits were in the oven (9 minutes) -- and including adjusting the towel under the door (have to do that every time I go dark), opening the factory cassette with a bottle opener, and cutting both ends of the film in the dark, I had more than two minutes left on the timer when I came out of the darkroom.

Even my fast-fill Nikor tank takes way too long to fill. And if you give the Paterson inversion cap a Tupperware-approved "burp" after closing, it won't leak. I usually have to wipe up a little liquid off my counter after processing, but that's not due to the cap leaking; that's because I fill my pre-wet and wash under the sink tap and the tank gets wet when I do so.
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
I set mine down firmly enough on the sacrificial dish towel to hear a muffled thump, and then lightly thwack the side of the plastic tank twice for luck.

I have absolutely no idea if it's a waste of time or not, but since it doesn't seem to hurt... why not?
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,369
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I bought a 3/8" thick block of linoleum that I use to give the stainless steel tank several hard thumps after I fill it with developer. Each chemical including water gets a hard thump. I have never in over 60 years had air bell problems when I develop film in a stainless steel tank.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom