I tend toward traditional B&W film, but for color I prefer
modern emulsions
I understand the what the question is trying to say, but I feel it presupposes something is easier/better/whatever. There are many "modern" items which take up more of our time than the things they replaced, and this has been true throughout history.
To test the validity of the question, one can apply it to other areas that do not appear, on the surface, to be so controversial or imperative.
No one asks how my bicycle fits into my modern lifestyle. Nor do they ask the same about walking (not even the people I've met who own Segways). Certainly I can get places faster, or travel further, in a car or public transportation, but this was true before I was old enough to drive.
The same is true of using the traditional old fire (natural gas) for heating and cooking compared to electricity (at least not in the U.S.A., where gas is cheaper and more efficient). I've cooked with both gas and electric, and the old gas flame is faster.
Forced-air heating is seen by many to be more modern, whereas radiator (and liquid baseboard) heat does not dry the already dry winter air as much.
For all of the above, including photography, I don't feel it is a question of "
modern lifestyle" so much as what one desires, enjoys, has time for, and/or considers important - up-front cost, efficiency, robustness, ease, quality, etc.