I am not afraid to go to her and touch her - "mold" her in the position I like.
If I do it right, it won't be misunderstood, and so many times the model doesn't know/understand what you want her to do with her body. I'ts all about the details.
Could be the young woman whom I simply could not look at properly for many humming minutes
because she was so astonishingly, breathtakingly beautiful that I could hardly bear to look at her, let alone draw her -- and then, when I could, my attempts, representing her appearance and presence so utterly inadequately, peasant scrawls in the radiance of a Queen, had I kept plodding along, would surely have made me burst into tears, so I fled the studio and sheltered in the mens' to collect myself...
I respect your work but I disagree with this
suggestion. I almost never touch the people
I am photographing. The exception is when
I am shooting a view camera and a fallen
strand of hair needs to be repositioned -- and
then, only after asking permission to do so.
Otherwise, words and gestures suffice to
direct a model into position.
I would suggest that anyone interested go to the Jock Sturges interview, and read what he has to say about the subject. I agree with him, word for word.
Re models, I think you really have to be careful when putting your hands on someone, legally and otherwise.
I posed this question as a survey to see whether there is a consensus or a variety of differing approaches.
Good question.
I will NEVER touch a model, even if asked. Every problem with wardrobe or hair, or ... has either been solved by the model or those on the scene dedicated to such activity.
I have the HIGHEST respect for the models I've worked with - even those where our personalities did not "mesh", and the session was unsuccessful. Hopefully that respect will be evident in my mannerisms and speech.
.
Maybe it is easier for me, as I am danish? and mostly use danish models?
I have used foreign models also, but no americans (yet).
I'd agree with this, of course. I've only shot a few models nude - half a dozen or so - but the other watchword for me at least is 'humour,' or at least I try. By which I don't mean putting on a standup routine, but if you don't take yourself too seriously and the model is on the same wavelength then hopefully you can both relax.With respect.
I could be wrong, but there is somewhat of a chasm between American sexual values and those of Europe, particularly the Netherlands region. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
I think, however, when you get to the level of art production, it's different. (By the way, I didn't take your comment as anti-American.)
I'm always careful as to what words I use. I always state something like, "You have beautiful anatomy here, let's try . . . ."
I guess it gets tricky when you're really down to the fine details. I have a model that I'm going to be doing a shoot with and the way her pubic hair has been in other work is perfect. There's a natural, but manicured, look that's important.
So, I'm just trying to figure out how to broach the matter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?