• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

How about this for self control...

The Band

D
The Band

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Aurora

A
Aurora

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,585
Messages
2,856,833
Members
101,916
Latest member
tfpix
Recent bookmarks
0

Uncle Bill

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
I checked out a local camera haunt that has used gear on consignment, today they had a Contax S2b with the 50/1.7 Plannar lens. I was so torn because I have my heart set on an Olympus OM-1. I did the research on the camera online, there is enough out there that really got me interested. The big question is do I really need this camera when I will be getting a classic shortly. The price was really good considering what the S2B went for in the early 1990's. So I am taking a few days to think it over. Thoughts anyone?

Bill
 
I dunno, We had an OM2 for a while and I wasn't overly impressed with it. Maybe the OM1 was better. I have heard Contax was pretty good but no personal experience with one.
 
Om-1... OM-2... it's the lenses that matter, and OM Zuiko lenses are superb. Personally I would choose the OM-1 over the OM-2.
 
I use an S2 constantly. It is a nice, simple mechanical body that will mount the Carl Zeiss T* lenses. I love the CZ lenses but they are expensive and I already had an investment them and I like manual SLRs so the S2 was my only option except maybe an older Yashica.
If you are starting a system from scratch, it would be hard to overlook the superb quality and economy of the Olympus.
They are both excellent cameras but I think I might lean towards the Olympus. I can't imagine you being disappointed either way.
 
I have an OM-1n and think it is truly one of the greats. I couldn't agree with Andy more about the quality of the Zuiko lenses.
 
Andy K said:
Om-1... OM-2... it's the lenses that matter, and OM Zuiko lenses are superb. Personally I would choose the OM-1 over the OM-2.

I solved that problem by getting both, oh and another OM-2, oh and 2 OM-4s, oh and, oops.

David.
 
I made up my mind, I am getting the OM-1. I am more into the vintage thing anyway.

Bill
 
Uncle Bill said:
I made up my mind, I am getting the OM-1. I am more into the vintage thing anyway.

Bill
OUCH! I just want you to know how old I feel to see an OM-1 being referred to as a "vintage thing" Please wait till I'm dead before you do that again! :wink:
-Bob
 
That's the strange thing... I have never considered my OM-1 'vintage'. It works like a new camera, pretty much looks like a new camera. (Except to a guy I met while out shooting in the summer with a Nikon D70 round his neck who asked 'Wow, that's small, is it a Leica?')
 
I notice today on Ebay someone posted a pile of Oly lenses and such in the darkroom supplies & equipment section. I guess it totally escapes some folks what a category is for.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom