Film has a far better response to highlights than any digital sensor currently made. I've heard that's a major reason they still shoot movies on film. I shoot a lot of difficult lighting situations, especially where the light is coming right in front of me into the lens. Digital clips the highlights. You can underexpose but that doesn't always work so well.
The other reason is the ability to make silver prints. Though there are digital enlargers and led/laser printers, they are beyond the reach of most. For black and white silver prints are best. I can still scan the negative and go that way, also. Shooting digital limits you to digital printing, be that inkjet or laser/LED to RA4.
I do have a DSLR and use it frequently. It is used for work or other time sensitive tasks. The photos hanging on the walls, though are mostly film captures.
The other reason is the ability to make silver prints. Though there are digital enlargers and led/laser printers, they are beyond the reach of most. For black and white silver prints are best. I can still scan the negative and go that way, also. Shooting digital limits you to digital printing, be that inkjet or laser/LED to RA4.
I do have a DSLR and use it frequently. It is used for work or other time sensitive tasks. The photos hanging on the walls, though are mostly film captures.