First, get corrective lenses that allow you to focus camera without autofocus. For 35mm camgeras, nothing is more rugged, both in terms of interior design and external toughness, than a Nikon F or F2. I have used my F since 1964 with perhaps only two CLAs, just to keep it happy. If a prism without TTL meter then no worry about batteries (use handheld meter or exposure calculator); no worries about autofocusing errors, etc. Plus very good lenses.
Why were they fogged up? Just condensation? Was it temporary?
I thought that England was sunny all the time, it was when we visited a couple years ago. Are the mirrorless cameras any better in pouring rain than DSLRs? I shoot Nikon D850 and D6. Thinking about it I don't think I've ever been in anything but a light shower.
My good friend is a photographer for a local newspaper, they use the latest Canon mirrorless equipment, he definitely gets damp not sure if they have some sort of protection??
Went with my gut, ordered a Canon 5D Mk. IV. Now onto lenses.
However my 100 2.8 macro is not an L and it's amazing.
Yes, it is. Excellent price/performance ratio.
Get them used for a song. They're also great for portraits and scanning film.
I have corrective lenses but sadly they can’t fix the underlying issues fully.
Also I want to shoot digital. Only shoot film 120, in the Hasselblad. And that’ll be going digital early 2024
Hi all.
I'm at a loss as to what camera to get. For the last 5-10 years I've been choosing cameras on a whim, not really making considered purchases. I now have a collection of cameras I enjoy, or don't, but I don't have one that does what I need.
(snip)
What do you all suggest? Any details I missed? Thanks
----
EDIT: The Nikon D850 is a possible winner. Certainly rugged enough. Good battery life. Good selection of lenses.
Hey, quick update. On phone so typos and missing details, happy to fill in later.
I spent all day yesterday walking from shop to shop in London, and on the phone to stores further afield, before I eventually called a large camera rental business.
It left me with a boring choice and feeling conflicted.
The general consensus among the shops was that they have more failures overall with Fuji gear and spend more time dealing with the Fuji rep on returns than Canon or Nikon. This is across the entire range not just the X-T5. Each shop told me to ignore the Fuji website (especially “that picture”) and treat the cameras like they can take a brief bit of rain but carry a cloth with you and when you can take the lens off and dry them. They have more failures on the Fuji bodies than the lenses and almost always it is the main board failing. No doubt though that the X-T5 is a superb camera, super fast and accurate.
According to the shops, the order of things going wrong is Fuji, Canon, then Nikon. The numbers are small, that needs to be said. They also said if a Nikon goes wrong the service department is awful compared to Canon. All three shops said the same thing, no bias. All are well known.
I got to try all three cameras I was looking at. The EVF and seeing the exposure live in the Fuji is fantastic but I was losing confidence in the build, and that biased me.
The Nikon is heavy, the Canon is lovely. The Nikon sensor is amazing though, the recovery if you mess up exposure is immense. The Canon looks better out of camera, I do really like Canon colours. However Nikon is super close now, and at higher ISO the Nikon noise is like grain. Honestly for stills the Nikon wins, and I never shoot video so the Nikon is the obvious choice. Higher resolution, better build, great colours, better noise etc. But my gut is saying Canon, my head is saying Nikon.
I then had a coffee and Googled rental cameras.
When speaking to the rental company they said for reliability in bad weather go Nikon. If it breaks the service will take weeks or months compared to Canons days. But it is very unlikely to fail. They have never had a D850 fail (aside from one dropped from a crane), they’ve had “a few” 5D IVs fail due to “water and weather” but they rent out many more and the camera has been out longer. It’s a close call. On Fuji they rarely rent them out so couldn’t say much.
So I’m now going to look at lenses. I’ll be shooting 24, 35, 50. I rarely go longer and I don’t like zooms. The lenses will choose for me.
On that note the weather sealing on Nikon and Canon lenses real world is apparently very similar, so it’s more down to cost and output for my decision.
Meantime today I’m shooting the Hasselblad with a plastic bag over it. Due to pour down in a few
While waiting for the camera to arrive, it got stuck (lost) but is now due for delivery tomorrow, I went out with the XPro 3 again and once again it let the water in. So I know I’ve made the right decision. The Fuji will be relegated to dry days out with family, and London streets.
Regarding lenses, can anyone suggest weather sealed lenses they have experience with? 24, 35, 50, maybe 80mm.
I need the 35mm asap but the rest can wait.
EDIT: Decided to stick with Canon L for the moment, ordered a 35mm.
My original order fell through, or to be more precise the box arrived without the lens. This gives me an opportunity. I've read the second version is much sharper, but I'll see if I can rent and test both. I don't pixel peep, so unless the difference is drastic the cost saving of the original is worth it.Like most things, it depends upon whose opinion you value but the original EF 35mm f1.4 L is/was very highly regarded and can be found for around 1/2 the price of the 35 1.4 L II. I haven't read up on any weather sealing differences between the 2 generations. I've got the more modest EF 35mm f2 IS, and I like it a lot, but I wouldn't take it out into a downpour without a shield of some type.
Have one, sometimes I want something differentWhy not join the rangefinder set and your compositions will improve over time.
I think You should probably stick with your Hasselblad; too bad they don't offer AF but you may be happier with a different finder and the best screen to focus
My original order fell through, or to be more precise the box arrived without the lens. This gives me an opportunity. I've read the second version is much sharper, but I'll see if I can rent and test both. I don't pixel peep, so unless the difference is drastic the cost saving of the original is worth it.
Have one, sometimes I want something different
I guess dad or mom will find out how good Sony’s water sealing is
View attachment 357614
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?