Help diagnosing these ruined negs?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,123
Messages
2,786,505
Members
99,818
Latest member
Haskil
Recent bookmarks
0

crumpet8

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
393
Location
Scandinavia
Format
Medium Format
Hi everyone :smile:

Lost some photos today... old chem c41. What I'm wondering about is the large dark patch that's collected at the bottom of my roll. Haven't seen this before I don't think. What could be the cause?

The roll should be exposed correctly, I assume they came out thin due to bad chem/dev. Or is the large mass of dark patch related?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2281.JPG
    IMG_2281.JPG
    464.6 KB · Views: 182

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
It looks like the exposure is off. Check the light meter. Check the light meter settings. Check the camera.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,182
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I'd agree with bvy - some sort of fogging exposure.
 

bvy

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,285
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
So the dev was ok (as seen by the black patch) but the other pictures that are thin were underexposed?
That would be my guess. That the fogged area developed to black indicates that your developer was at least active. The thin frames point to an exposure problem. Faulty shutter? Metered incorrectly?
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Did you process this roll in a rotary tank? If yes, what was the volume of color developer you used?
 
OP
OP
crumpet8

crumpet8

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
393
Location
Scandinavia
Format
Medium Format
That would be my guess. That the fogged area developed to black indicates that your developer was at least active. The thin frames point to an exposure problem. Faulty shutter? Metered incorrectly?

The camera should be fine, the last roll I shot at Christmas came out perfect. This roll is a mix of about four different situations from New Years to now so I don't think I'd have metered so many shots so poorly either. I use my hand held Gossen instead of the prism and it's never let me down.
 
OP
OP
crumpet8

crumpet8

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
393
Location
Scandinavia
Format
Medium Format
Did you process this roll in a rotary tank? If yes, what was the volume of color developer you used?

Paterson two roll tank with a little under 500ml. One 120 spiral roll in The tank as it doesn't take both when developing 120
 

mnemosyne

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
759
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Apparently edge markings came out fine, which indicates the roll was not (extremely) underdeveloped. That leaves underexposure (wrong metering or faulty camera) as the only reason for the lack of density in the frames. The black area at the end of the roll has been fogged by light, either in camera through a light leak, during loading/unloading (possible cause: film not wound tightly enought on the spool) or during processing in darkroom.
 
OP
OP
crumpet8

crumpet8

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
393
Location
Scandinavia
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the tips everyone! Was thinking along the same lines as memosyne, maybe I have to check my light meter batteries or I just messed up what film speed I was metering... was shooting about three different rolls on two cameras at the time :/
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom