Hi,
EDIT: I just took a closer look at my argus shutter release, with a flashlight. It seems to be very SLIGHTLY threaded. The shutter release is in a tubular shape, that then has a solid bottom to it. The threading is very light, almost faint, and it doesnt appear as well done as on your model. Mine is from 1952-1954... It has two flash acessory holes on the side, and not three like the 1954 models. Anyways, there you go... I think something like you mentioned could work. I'll go ahead and bite the bullet: What is the cost for a shutter cable like that?
My only goal is to take some self-shots, and maybe also some time exposures in dark lighting, that would require the use of 1/10th of a second and a tripod.
Hello from western PA! If you're ever out by Pittsburgh, there are lots of great places out here to shoot.
Like so many things in the photography world, there's a a wide range of specs and pricing; here's some offerings. Some will argue for fairly high end stuff, I tend to go slow, since they're easy to lose. I bought my C3 new in very early 1958, it has the two flash jacks, and you can see some of the business end in that previous photo. In general, the longer a cable release is, the harder it is to push -- and if your C3 is like mine, the shutter release is pretty stiff as is. I find something around 8 to 10 inches is usually enough just to isolate vibration. If you want more of a remote release, you might get into the air bulb things which I have zero experience with. For self portraits it might be simpler to talk a friend or neighbor into stopping buy and pushing the button.
The locking releases can be used with the bulb setting (a quarter turn of that top hat shaped piece around the shutter button) to do long exposures for night shots, that could be useful.
The C3 was made over a long stretch of time and there appear to have been quite a few mods along the way. It might also be that yours was used or abused with cable releases being screwed in and out, or maybe even banged into something and the cable fitting knocked out stripping the threads a bit. It's a tapered thread that seems to be about a #6-32 at the widest part. I used a 6-32 press nut to attach a cable to a pinhole body cap on one of my cameras.
Nope. If you mean the Harrisburg one, that's about 3 hours from here. There may still be one south of Pittsburgh, but it was slated to be torn down and/or turned into condos. There are also some remaining mills and assorted buildings around. I know of a group that checks out those sorts of places, but I haven't had a chance to go (new baby).Absolutely!
Have you been down to the state hospital?
That's my number one stop, for life.
I have yet to go there...
So, a standard shutter release cable will work? Do you advise locking or non-locking?
Sorry, i'm just a n00b. This also assumes that whichever I pick, i can use it with the "I" and "B" settings.
Thanks for your help!
Thanks DWThomas, that's plenty of advice!
I'm thinking about also getting an air bulb for the self shots, just to give it a try.
So, it looks like my money for my new paycheck is going a little like this: 20 rolls of film, tripod, two shutter releases.
The next paycheck will be aimed at a Pentax K1000, and everything else to be tucked away.
Thanks everyone!
.
Have you considered a Minolta camera, the price is right on the bodies,
and lenses. Might be a bit more versatile than the Pentax, I haven't seen
a K1000 since 1979. So, I might be out of touch with the selection of
Pentax equipment, and accessories.
I'm Just Saying ...
Ron
From The Long Island Of New York,
And The Macro Management, and Long Island @ Large Format APUG Groups
.
.
The SRT, and XE Series from the 70's are practically BulletProof.
Avoid the 80's generation of XG,XD, X-3,X-5, and X-700 Series.
My XE-7 is 35 years old - at least, I only change the batteries,
and give it film. The meter is still accurate, but I'm a Sekonic
kinda guy anyhows. Grab Grandpas Minolta, and slap a lens on it.
In the past few months I got 2 SRT-101's w/ lenses at thrift shops,
paid less than $15.00 for both.
And the function flawlessly !!!
Ron
From The Long Island Of New York,
And The Macro Management, and Long Island @ Large Format APUG Groups
.
.
Giving you the Minolta would be the best way to
respect his brothers existence !
You might have to explain the situation to Gramps.
WTF ??? : $150.00 for what ??? That's disrespectful to your wallet.
You need that money for film !!!
They didn't cost that much when they were new ....
Do a little eBaying, bid on an item that has a return policy.
I hope when I'm gone, my equipment will be used my son, and his kids ...
.
.
The K1000 w/ 50mm lens sold for $150.00 Brand Spanking New in the 70's.
I bought my XE-7 body only, used in 1978 for $250.
I can buy a used XE-7 w/ 50mm lens now for $25.00 ...
Something Aint Right With The Numbers.
You went this long without a camera ...
Take a few more days, or another week and shop carefully.
Ask The APUGers ! Get A Second Opinion ...
.
.
Unfortunately, I am a Devout Minoltalogist !
All the Minolta cameras that I own that were made before 1978,
are still fully functional. The Cameras I bought after 78 are either
kaput, or sold off due me being disappointed by them. ( XG-9, XD-11 meh, and double meh )
Once You Handle A Black XE-7, You Won't Want Anything Else !
Except For The XK Motor !! ... But that's a long story.
We won't go there ....
.
.
We are all photography students.
But, we should never be typical photography students.
If we wanted to be typical, we would all be running around
with DigiSnappers, and $3000.00, 15 MegaPixel cameras ...
I'm Just Saying ...
Ron
.
.
In a few weeks you'll be developing your own B&W film !
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?