• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Health risks of darkroom chemicals

Forum statistics

Threads
201,654
Messages
2,827,974
Members
100,870
Latest member
arthursterling
Recent bookmarks
0

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
^^^ The problem is 30-50 years ago this stuff wasn't paid much attention to... not even more recently. Even if manufacturers knew of the risks they played it down or covered it up.
 

john_s

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,202
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
If you did some school chemistry you already know how to handle ordinary chemicals and how to dilute acids etc. One of the photo chemicals with a bad reputation is pyrogallol. This link to an NTP summary might alleviate your fears (of photo chemicals) but ignite your fears of junk food and smoked food, both of which contain pyrogallol.

Dead Link Removed
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,844
Format
8x10 Format
A lot of assumptions. I wouldn't want to even think about offering darkroom classes without a mtn of liability insurance, and very carefully restricting the chemicals in it. Harmless? One mistake diluting acetic acid can ruin your lungs for life. Ordinary stop bath ain't necessarily harmless. I know people who made that kind of mistake and were debilitated for the rest of their life. Not everyone took a basic high school chemistry class, or even remembers it, or even has a decent fume hood. And anyone with a bit of background in this kind of thing knows that there are very very few studies on the superadditive physiological effects of small amounts of various chemicals. One of my close friends died at a relatively young age because he was an EPA inspector tracing these things - hard to say exactly which combination of chemicals or pesticides or whatever got to him, but they sure did. A friend of mine who cleaned the drain intakes of one of the biotech labs nearby had a stroke at 40, even though he'd ordinarily be considered low risk. And that was due to stuff that wasn't even EPA or hazmat regulated. I've seen long-term customers of mine argue about these kinds of subject, and by the time they turned 50 their hands
were shaking so bad they couldn't even sign their own name, from all the nerve damage. Yeah... be macho. There's a synonym for that:
FOOL.
 

OptiKen

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
1,055
Location
Orange County
Format
Medium Format
I've been using photographic materials for about forty years and now my hair is going grey. It must be the fault of the chemicals, surely?
:wink:

You must have a light case. I have a friend who has been a professional photographer his entire adult life and he LOST his hair - plus he's getting fat now.

There should be some kind of charity or support group for Old Photographers.
Maybe we should all wear Kodak Yellow ribbons to raise awareness to the problem.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,318
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
If Drew's concerns about health and safety and his legal liability are correct then I fear for Ilford's attempt to spread the use of sharing home darkrooms which was a thread here quite recently.

pentaxuser
 

Ken Nadvornick

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,943
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
I guess the home photographic darkroom is dead then.

It has become far and away too dangerous today to develop the same films and make the same prints that were able to be easily and safely made at home only a few short decades ago. Oh how things have changed.

But that's progress for you...

:sad:

Ken
 

Wayne

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
3,622
Location
USA
Format
Large Format
One of my close friends died at a relatively young age because he was an EPA inspector tracing these things - hard to say exactly which combination of chemicals or pesticides or whatever got to him, but they sure did.


How do you know that? What did he die from? What did the doctor's and coroner's reports say?


A friend of mine who cleaned the drain intakes of one of the biotech labs nearby had a stroke at 40, even though he'd ordinarily be considered low risk. And that was due to stuff that wasn't even EPA or hazmat regulated.

again...correlation is not causation, and you are stating causation without providing nearly enough information to arrive at that conclusion. Caution is always good, but groundless fear is not helpful. Its more likely to cause complete avoidance when basic safety is all that's needed.
 

RattyMouse

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
How do you know that? What did he die from? What did the doctor's and coroner's reports say?




again...correlation is not causation, and you are stating causation without providing nearly enough information to arrive at that conclusion. Caution is always good, but groundless fear is not helpful. Its more likely to cause complete avoidance when basic safety is all that's needed.

Agreed. This guy died of a stroke, which is a complete blockage of blood to the brain. Chemical exposures do NOT cause this type of damage. Certainly not after a single event such as unblocking a clogged drain.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom