HCB Appreciation

[nikos79]

And some very interesting quotes about Henri-Cartier Bresson's work:
Would be interesting to hear your counter-argument thoughts

"Despite his love for painting and especially drawing, which he devoted to in his old age, photography was the medium that highlighted him early on and gave him the opportunity to leave a profoundly significant personal work. His few journalistic-style photos simply reflect the post-war photographic fashion and do not organically integrate into the main body of his work, which he described as surrealistic. Cartier-Bresson's interest lay more in the area where the elements of the world generated peculiar coincidences. His images convey the photographer's restrained character, with his subterranean explosions and carefully concealed tenderness.

Cartier-Bresson convinced us that he positioned himself opposite the world to capture its inner order and derive a complex (organic, sensual, and intellectual) joy that the actual world does not provide him. Cartier-Bresson is not a photographer of events. His moments do not stop time; instead, they extend it or generate their own time. Through the few photographs that represent his most robust artistic proposition, one can discover a new world and not merely recognize, as happens in any photography, a world already known. Cartier-Bresson reacts to stimuli from the outside world to convey his inner balance. His and the world's.

In most of his photographs, the subjects are treated with phlegmatic respect and are used as elements of the whole rather than emotional burdens. Perhaps in this way, the photographer respects the photographed even more, rejecting the dubious sincerity role of the sympathizer and adopting that of the observer-orchestrator, the only one ultimately capable of eliciting genuine emotion. Cartier-Bresson uses form to give each event its significance, thus altering the hierarchy of values of everyday life and revealing the hidden and possibly spiritual meaning of things."

Plato Rivellis in his section "Important photographers and their work"

 

[nikos79]

It's his tagline whether he liked it or not.

But did he ever really say it?

 

[Alex Benjamin]

But did he ever really say it?

We're going in circles. This has been discussed before. Here are excerpts from two interviews that have been quoted elsewhere on this site:

— What exactly to you mean by The Decisive Moment, the American title of Images à la sauvette?
— You want to know more about the title? Well, I had nothing to do with it. I found a line in the memoirs of Cardinal de Retz, in which he said: "There is nothing in this world which does not have a decisive moment." I used the quote as an inscription in the French edition, and when we were thinking of titles for the American edition, we had a whole page of possibilities. Suddenly, Dick Simon said: "Why not use 'The Decisive Moment'?"

*

— The concept of the "decisive moment" has become essential for the aesthetics of a whole generation of photographers. Others, such as Robert Frank, have defined themselves againts what this notion implies about the organization of visualy space and of the world, and have characterized you work with the limited term of "classic space".
— ... It was Dick Simon who found the title for the book, The Decisive Moment, after I had simply used an excerpted quote by Cardinal de Retz as an epigraph in the book... In the end, all moments are equal. But all moments are indecisive within the stream of reality. However, for me, as for any artist, there is recognition of a life-saving formal order, countering disintegration through banality, chaos, and oblivion. And that can be found in Robert Frank's work too, though our visual solutions diverge, in accordance with our visions of the world.

*

Original line is:

« Il n’y a rien en ce monde qui n’ait un moment décisif. »

 

[Don_ih]

But did he ever really say it?

At this point, when you talk about the phrase "decisive moment", it's far more relevant to think of it as something people constantly apply to Cartier-Bresson (because they do) than whether or not he actually said. People routinely interpret his photos as exemplifying the "decisive moment" as a guiding principle - whether he had any such idea or not.

When talking about him, it makes far more sense to focus on how he arranged his compositions - the ones he got printed - instead of focusing on how many photos he took and rejected as some kind of slight against a mythology that's applied rather than inherent (namely, the decisive moment).

So, what I was talking about it I think it's better to not adopt any mystical viewpoint about the working methods of Cartier-Bresson (or anyone who utilizes visualization/pre-visualization, for that matter) and just assume he wanted to get the elements of the composition right, when confronted by a dynamic situation. Anyone who has tried it knows it's difficult to do even once, let alone how many times he did it.

 

[Alan Edward Klein]

Probably a lot. What does that matter? Is there something wrong with trying to get the best possible photo?

It doesn't matter. I;m just trying to show he;s human just like the rest of us and wastes a lot of film as well.

 

[nikos79]

It doesn't matter. I;m just trying to show he;s human just like the rest of us and wastes a lot of film as well.

Ah now I get it. Totally agree with you, I even highlighted this fact earlier in my posts in this thread.
But looking at the contact we also see something else, not only he knows how to "see" photograph but also knows how to "look" at photographs later (as his choices were always spot on)

 

[ezphotolessons]

It doesn't matter. I;m just trying to show he;s human just like the rest of us and wastes a lot of film as well.

I donot think he was-human, more of a giant-demi-god-titan

 

[nikos79]

...
...

Perfect thanks, exactly what I was looking for!

 

[Alex Benjamin]

I;m just trying to show he;s human just like the rest of us

Being better at something—or at any part of something—than just about everybody else is an intrinsic part of being human. There's nothing more human than the exceptional.

 

[nikos79]

When talking about him, it makes far more sense to focus on how he arranged his compositions - the ones he got printed - instead of focusing on how many photos he took and rejected as some kind of slight against a mythology that's applied rather than inherent (namely, the decisive moment).

As Diane Arbus said (or maybe someone else not sure) you need the bad photos they are very useful. They are the ones that get you out of your comfort zone. HCB knew very well that searching for the one photo that will stand out many need to be rejected. It is natural. Otherwise all your photos would look the same like ... (put any photographer you want here)

 

[Alan Edward Klein]

I’m still unsure whether HCB coined the ‘decisive moment’ phrase, or whether it was dumped on him by his publisher, perhaps by over-distilling elements of HCB’s mercurial conversation. It generates misconceptions, and HCB clearly wearied of trying to explain the way he saw things.

What I understand of his beliefs, from various interviews, is that there may be (but isn’t necessarily) a ‘decisive moment’ when all the elements come together to form a perfect image. Those elements include not only components of the subject, but also the camera position and where it is pointing. About the latter, HCB pointed out that the difference between an exquisite composition and something ‘meh’ (as you would say) may be a movement of millimetres. Sometimes (often? usually?) it isn’t possible, or the subject has changed or vanished, and there is no decisive moment.

Sometimes the photographer can both recognise the moment and be able to nail it in one shot. HCB’s portrait of the Joliot-Curies is a famous example, where he took the photo as soon as they opened the door, then spent the rest of the visit taking photos out of politeness. But sometimes in the heat of the moment the photographer can only make several attempts and hope he has nailed it. In other words, recognising and selecting the moment can happen either before or after pressing the button. Discarding failures that fail to meet the artist’s standards is a valid aspect of photography or painting or pottery or bow-making or most other creative practices.

The wall never moves, so it's easier to get its decisive moment. It;s the kids that are a problem when you have so many and you;re trying to get all to show something emotional, which his final selection did wonderfully. That requires lots of shots, which he took.

Ever shoot three shots of friends standing there smiling for a picture. Why? Well, one of them is always blinking so you take three to eliminate that issue and catch the decisive moment. Hopefully. That's what HCB did, and does.