Sorry, I don't need to show you jack, Kodak calls it HC-110 and so it is. With your logic the defenders of the environment would have hijacked the entire manufacturing and countless products would need to change name with every new regulation taking effect, when complying with it means changing a component. In the end, if substitution of one or several parts delivers same results (and I will take Kodak over you baseless assumptions on this) then it is a "new formula with same results" as Kodak clearly indicates.