HC-110 New Formula

[NB23]

And again, where is your evidence it is NOT the same? If it was for Kodak why isn't it?

Because obviously it is not the same. It’s a NEW FORMULA and it’s written on the label

Now you please show us evidence that it is the same.

 

[Deleted member 88956]

Because obviously it is not the same. It’s a NEW FORMULA and it’s written on the label

Now you please show us evidence that it is the same.

Sorry, I don't need to show you jack, Kodak calls it HC-110 and so it is. With your logic the defenders of the environment would have hijacked the entire manufacturing and countless products would need to change name with every new regulation taking effect, when complying with it means changing a component. In the end, if substitution of one or several parts delivers same results (and I will take Kodak over you baseless assumptions on this) then it is a "new formula with same results" as Kodak clearly indicates.

 

[NB23]

Sorry, I don't need to show you jack, Kodak calls it HC-110 and so it is. With your logic the defenders of the environment would have hijacked the entire manufacturing and countless products would need to change name with every new regulation taking effect, when complying with it means changing a component. In the end, if substitution of one or several parts delivers same results (and I will take Kodak over you baseless assumptions on this) then it is a "new formula with same results" as Kodak clearly indicates.

Of course you don’t have to show me jack. That’s because you have no ability to prove it. All the rest is blabla.