Thanks for the invite, I'll keep in mind and hopefully get a chance to take advantage of it. I frequent Munich airport twice or thrice a year and once managed to go up to an in-city hotel when flights got cancelledOne last thing to say about the SWC: do not forget to remove the lens cap
Witold, I see you are from Poland, if you happen to come to Munich at some point (difficult those times, I know) and are still undecided about the SWC by then, let me know and i’ll let you shoot a roll or two with mine. If you have an SWC by then, take it with you and drop by for a beer and a photo stroll.
This is of course a good point, but I'm comfortable shooting my desires in whatever angle, so indeed I was after gear heavy input when I wrote this one.@Witold the thread has been very gear-focused. If you're asking for "things to watch out", IMO the biggest thing is: are you sure you want such a wide angle? This is the ignored elephant in the room. A camera like that requires a lot of photographic skill to produce non-garbage results. Outside a few cliche special effect shots, I am completely hopeless at that FOV, and that - in my opinion - is THE thing to "watch out for".
I think there is a huge difference between SWC and any other body, from form factor to ... convenient lack of choice. Sometimes, and sometimes often, not having to think of choices works to advantage. SWC gives a choice, what it has or none. So once taken it becomes a tool with single view, feet to work it, and vision to exploit it.It seems to me that you might be happier and better off with a 500 or later body and a 40mm lens. You get the focusing screen, the release button where you're comfortable and the larger size should not be an issue since you want to work off a tripod anyway. The 40mm is a fine lens (and expensive), not as spectacular as the 38 but most probably suitable for your needs. My 2 cents.
The SWC is the best point-and-shoot camera out there, with the fastest „autofocus“ (if we can name it so ha ha).
Its history is very complex, as many different models were released since the SWA introduction in the 50‘s.
"2) The shutter of early SWC/M with CF-type lenses is said to scratch a lens element. I never could find out whether this is urban legend or not. In my opinion it most probably is, but inspecting the lens for that before buying wouldn’t hurt...
Does someone here has more info about this?"
It's always been my impression this is a one lens (built in) camera.
Am I wrong?
Eli
The few times I've used a SWC for deep focus landscape pictures I've shot it upside down. The lens intrudes into the viewfinder frame so near detail is blotted out. Typical question "Is that flower near my feet in or out of the frame?". Can't tell if you can't see it. In upside down mode the framing error is in the sky where critical detail is unlikely.
I think there is a huge difference between SWC and any other body, from form factor to ... convenient lack of choice. Sometimes, and sometimes often, not having to think of choices works to advantage. SWC gives a choice, what it has or none. So once taken it becomes a tool with single view, feet to work it, and vision to exploit it.
I mentioned working SWC off a tripod because I see some applications where it will have to be steadied up. And using ground glass requires it, which I would definitely do. Working handheld is appealing, even if am a bit puzzled why some apparently use it this way almost exclusively.
But I can't fool myself thinking I'll get SWC and somehow stop there. While it is a sole stand alone in V-system by its shear design, it is still part of it accepting a number of accessories. So what I think will be smart is SWC & 503 combo. But that requires more considerations before pulling the trigger.
No, you are correct.
http://clearsightusa.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=52
I use this instead of the Hasselblad system for tripod mounting, as it is very solid and clips into an arca head, just like everything else I have, so I prefer it to the stock system since I usually have one tripod with me and multiple different cameras all with arca baseplates attached. Having said that, like others, I usually use it handheld even though I do own the ground glass back, etc, because it’s so much fun just to use it handheld. I don’t know why, just is. I had all those plans to use it carefully on a tripod, but it has not worked out that way. Maybe that’s just me.
Hopefully this is not the case on any 500 bodies, as that is the only direction I will take V kit after SWC.A word of warning, I have this on the SWC and it's great (all my cameras have Arca adapter). HOWEVER, on the 203FE, probably due to the size of the ball head / plate / adapter etc., it destroyed by plastic foot rest thing :-/ I "repaired" it using Sugra, but it ain't pretty
And I assume you don't mean "breathless" in Seinfeld episode's way.I love mine. Don’t use it enough but I’m still breathless every time I see the results.
someone should send me somewhere on the planet with only this camera. I’d be happy.
If there’s a seinfeld way, I say ok!And I assume you don't mean "breathless" in Seinfeld episode's way.
(Side note: I tried my SWC/M with the CFV 50c ii, it works, image quality is terrific as you can expect, but it is difficult to frame as the viewfinder does not have framelines for the 33x44 sensor. Using live view is possible but cumbersome. Feel free to PM me for more details)
While I don't see how this would not be true, can anyone confirm that viewfinders on SWC are interchangeable between models? I see some offers of SWC WITHOUT finder, as strange as this is they are out there. Getting one like that would give choice of finder. So even if say an M or C body already has bubble level in top plate, nothing prevents using a newer finder with its own bubble, so long as there are no differences preventing that. Finder is nothing that makes me go after newer or later body model, just in case body comes sans one ...
It's a bummer. Need to remove grip to work the dark slide, although grip is quick mounted, so not end of the world.
I've come to similar conclusion. There are actually only two thus far that somehow showed up without a finder, but I agree who knows what led to losing one in the first place. I assume though that I could use any of the two on any model year (in case I get the older, and come across a "deal" on newer one and want one too (probably not, would rather buy a couple of film backs instead).I would not buy a SWC without a finder too. It is a sign of sloppy equipment handling and who know what else the screwed up on neglected to properly maintain. You will be spending a lot of money so save aggravation and pain, buy a clean one without pieces missing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?