Hasselblad SWC anything to watch out for?

  • A
  • Thread starter Deleted member 88956
  • Start date

etn

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,113
Location
Munich, Germany
Format
Medium Format
One last thing to say about the SWC: do not forget to remove the lens cap

Witold, I see you are from Poland, if you happen to come to Munich at some point (difficult those times, I know) and are still undecided about the SWC by then, let me know and i’ll let you shoot a roll or two with mine. If you have an SWC by then, take it with you and drop by for a beer and a photo stroll.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

Thanks for the invite, I'll keep in mind and hopefully get a chance to take advantage of it. I frequent Munich airport twice or thrice a year and once managed to go up to an in-city hotel when flights got cancelled
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

This is of course a good point, but I'm comfortable shooting my desires in whatever angle, so indeed I was after gear heavy input when I wrote this one.

Agree though that wide angle can get uninspiring quickly, especially when a shot is hardly different than many seen all over. Just read a blog of Mr. Ming I think, and it was kind of sad to see few shots that apparently were shot in the same "laundry room". Good looking sharp images, just too samo-samo. I happened to frequent a few places were tight quarters cut away too much with even a moderate wide. SWC seems like a challenge in its own character to make shots interesting and interest lasting.
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,595
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
It seems to me that you might be happier and better off with a 500 or later body and a 40mm lens. You get the focusing screen, the release button where you're comfortable and the larger size should not be an issue since you want to work off a tripod anyway. The 40mm is a fine lens (and expensive), not as spectacular as the 38 but most probably suitable for your needs. My 2 cents.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
I love mine. Don’t use it enough but I’m still breathless every time I see the results.

someone should send me somewhere on the planet with only this camera. I’d be happy.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

I think there is a huge difference between SWC and any other body, from form factor to ... convenient lack of choice. Sometimes, and sometimes often, not having to think of choices works to advantage. SWC gives a choice, what it has or none. So once taken it becomes a tool with single view, feet to work it, and vision to exploit it.

I mentioned working SWC off a tripod because I see some applications where it will have to be steadied up. And using ground glass requires it, which I would definitely do. Working handheld is appealing, even if am a bit puzzled why some apparently use it this way almost exclusively.

But I can't fool myself thinking I'll get SWC and somehow stop there. While it is a sole stand alone in V-system by its shear design, it is still part of it accepting a number of accessories. So what I think will be smart is SWC & 503 combo. But that requires more considerations before pulling the trigger.
 

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,847
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,365
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format



Doh! Why didn't I thank of that!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,365
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

No, you are correct.
 

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,847
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format

I feel about the same, though I would prefer the 500 CM, because of it's simplicity and lack of battery demands, though I'd like a second,, as a back up, or even a 500 EL model/type just as well.

Frankly, I would buy an '01 or '03 model if they were in a good price range an I had the money to spend on one, however, I, like all here have ideal bag sets in mind and the 38mm Biogon is in there as well, though I expect to have to use the 50mm Distagon which is what I have, Happy and Forevermore.

Hasselblad 'V' Series are just lovely in the hand, and when used well, produce wonderful works, though I wish they were weather 'protected, like the indomitable Canon F1n and F1N or Nikon F.

Cheers
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

I always like these guys doing YT videos, pro quality and good music (and none when it's uncalled for). And SWC shown in use, not a typical YT review, which is another reason I like it.

THIS YT not so much, but handheld and shows well its size.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Richard Man

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
1,301
Format
Multi Format

A word of warning, I have this on the SWC and it's great (all my cameras have Arca adapter). HOWEVER, on the 203FE, probably due to the size of the ball head / plate / adapter etc., it destroyed by plastic foot rest thing :-/ I "repaired" it using Sugra, but it ain't pretty
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

And what do you know, a side grip was made for the SWC

 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

Hopefully this is not the case on any 500 bodies, as that is the only direction I will take V kit after SWC.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

I love mine. Don’t use it enough but I’m still breathless every time I see the results.

someone should send me somewhere on the planet with only this camera. I’d be happy.
And I assume you don't mean "breathless" in Seinfeld episode's way.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

Further poking at SWC set up, is anyone here using this rig? or tried at least. I know this makes compact set up not longer so, but I'm asking about what it feels like in use.

 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

It's a bummer. Need to remove grip to work the dark slide, although grip is quick mounted, so not end of the world.

 

Ai Print

Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
1,292
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format

Handheld and live view with the CFVII is cumbersome with the V cameras for sure.

But tripod work is another matter, I simply use a cable release on B on my 501CM’s and then use the back’s electronic shutter which has a range of 1/10,000th of a second to 68 minutes. I either use self timer to trigger it or the remote release that plugs in on the bottom. It’s especially easy with the Flexbody since like the SWC and ARC body there is no mirror so all you have to do is use the stop down lever and trigger the electronic shutter.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

While I don't see how this would not be true, can anyone confirm that viewfinders on SWC are interchangeable between models? I see some offers of SWC WITHOUT finder, as strange as this is they are out there. Getting one like that would give choice of finder. So even if say an M or C body already has bubble level in top plate, nothing prevents using a newer finder with its own bubble, so long as there are no differences preventing that. Finder is nothing that makes me go after newer or later body model, just in case body comes sans one ...
 

Larry Cloetta

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
176
Location
Jackson, WY
Format
35mm

Personally, I wouldn’t be inclined to buy an SWC/M or a 903 without a finder unless it was very cheap. Those finders tend to be hard to find as separate pieces and expensive if you do find one. But, someone might always get lucky. I’d personally be sure to have a finder lined up to buy before ever buying the camera without the finder. Both the older and newer Hasselblad finders have a lot of distortion, though they work for the purpose. Because of this some people like to use the Voigtländer right angle 6x6 finder with the SWC, instead of either Hasselblad finder, as it has much less distortion, as it makes for a nice “aim it and shoot camera with a much nicer view through the viewfinder, if you don’t care about the bubble level at all” style of shooting. Those seem to go for around $600 by themselves though.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,365
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I would not buy a SWC without a finder too. It is a sign of sloppy equipment handling and who know what else the screwed up on neglected to properly maintain. You will be spending a lot of money so save aggravation and pain, buy a clean one without pieces missing.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,365
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
It's a bummer. Need to remove grip to work the dark slide, although grip is quick mounted, so not end of the world.


You answered the question on use of a totally useless grip on a perfectly functioning body. Nice film back; I do not have one that new.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 88956

I've come to similar conclusion. There are actually only two thus far that somehow showed up without a finder, but I agree who knows what led to losing one in the first place. I assume though that I could use any of the two on any model year (in case I get the older, and come across a "deal" on newer one and want one too (probably not, would rather buy a couple of film backs instead).
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…