Hasselblad Frame Spacing

Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 1
  • 0
  • 16
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 101
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 2
  • 174

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,734
Messages
2,780,118
Members
99,694
Latest member
RetroLab
Recent bookmarks
0

E76

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
401
Location
Baltimore, MD
Format
Medium Format
I currently own two backs for my Hasselblad, both of which were manufactured in '98. The older back takes full advantage of the roll, and leaves a nice, wide space between each frame. The newer one, however, starts at the very beginning of the roll (very close to the tape), and leaves a small space between each frame (not unlike that of 35mm spacing). This, of course, leaves a lot of space at the end of the roll, more than enough to fit in another frame.

Is this normal? Could this be caused by the film I'm using (Fujicolor Pro in the older one, Arista.EDU Ultra in the newer one), or do I have a maladjusted back? :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kevin Caulfield

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,845
Location
Melb, Australia
Format
Multi Format
I'm not sure why your newer one would start at the very beginning of the roll, as presumably you are winding on to frame number 1 before shooting? I have several backs and the spacing between frames varies between them. When the spacing is too close you could well require servicing.
 
OP
OP
E76

E76

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
401
Location
Baltimore, MD
Format
Medium Format
I am winding on to frame one before shooting. Hopefully I don't need servicing, as I don't have the money at the moment. :sad:

I'm going to try a roll of Kodak TMAX next to see if the problem persists.
 

david b

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
4,026
Location
None of your
Format
Medium Format
So you are rolling the film till you hit the arrow.

Then putting the insert into the shell, and winding until it stops at 1

Right?
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
The back indeed needs adjusting. It's not a Big Job.

But try the work-around suggested while saving up for it.
 

arigram

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,465
Location
Crete, Greec
Format
Medium Format
Ilford films are to be winded up to the filled oblong point and not to the arrow as other films. I guess it could be the same with some other films, but I can't be certain as I usually use Ilford.
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Ilford films are to be winded up to the filled oblong point and not to the arrow as other films. I guess it could be the same with some other films, but I can't be certain as I usually use Ilford.
The Ilford Problem was solved long ago already. Ilford promised not to use off-spec spools anymore.
So unless you have really, really old Ilford film, no worries about Ilford! :wink:
 

Arvee

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
976
Location
Great Basin
Format
Multi Format
Until frame 1 and frame 2 overlap, I wouldn't give it a second thought. The workaround is a simple solution if the position of images bothers you. It's not a problem with the back as long at the frames don't overlap. Both my backs start about an inch from film end, just for a comparison, and have about 3/16" between frames. And they are A12 backs about the same vintage as yours.

Could also be that the 'tight' back hasn't seen much use and is stiff from dried lube. I had to have one of mine serviced by David Odess because the previous owner hadn't used that back but one time in 10 years! It had an overlap problem. If, perhaps, you use the tight back all the time it may loosen up and space better.

-Fred
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
E76

E76

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
401
Location
Baltimore, MD
Format
Medium Format
I can deal with the closeness in spacing, it's just how close the roll began to the tape that worried me. In fact, I lost a part of the first frame because of that.

I'm going to continue using the back to see if it does, in fact, "loosen up" (never thought lubricants could be the problem!) and I will try Mike's workaround.

Thanks for all the help, guys!
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
I can deal with the closeness in spacing, it's just how close the roll began to the tape that worried me. In fact, I lost a part of the first frame because of that.

I'm going to continue using the back to see if it does, in fact, "loosen up" (never thought lubricants could be the problem!) and I will try Mike's workaround.

Start saving up anyway. :wink:
Inside the magazine is an easily accesible, simple eccentric disc, held in place by a single screw. That thingy regulates the distance between the start mark and the first exposed frame.
It will need adjusting.

As mentioned before, it is not a big job.
The side cover will have to come off (three screws), the screw that holds the thing must be loosened a bit, the thing turned into the right position, the screw tightened again (and locked with locktite), and the cover can go on again.
Takes only a little bit longer than writing this.
 

jordanstarr

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
781
Location
Ontario
Format
Multi Format
For what it's worth, I just sent in my 500cm and 2 a-12 backs in for servicing as my body jammed hard enough to break internal mechanisms and since I was dealing with the odd frame overlap, I sent it all in for servicing.
When I got everything back the body was smooth as butter, but one of my backs was still overlapping (I sent it back and they did more work on it) and the other was producing odd spacing (some tight, some far apart, but none were overlapping). I called and asked if this was a cause for concern. They told me to not send it back unless it was overlapping because "it happens". I'm not sure if it's one of those situations where they lie to you to avoid doing more work under their repair warranty, but I've put through a few more rolls and there's not overlapping although the spacing is different between frames.

...I'm not sure this helps or not, but it's my experience. So far so good. I'm in a similar dilemma, but I think the bottom line is to start saving up some money incase you need the repair. Or at least think about QC's advice and doing it yourself. You can probably find a Hasselblad back repair manual on the net somewhere. If you can't I think I have one somewhere I can email to you if you send me a PM.
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Or at least think about QC's advice and doing it yourself.
I would only advice doing it yourself if you are confident enough to do so, know what you are doing (a good manual will help) and are willing to accept 'defeat', and pay for someone else to do it when you fail.

Mind you, the eccentric i mentioned only (!) regulates the distance between start mark and first frame.
It does not control the spacing between frames. There's something else inside the magazine that does that.

Adjusting that is also not a Big Job. But remember that you need to check what you do, i.e. run film through it, and mark each and every single frame (release camera; wind camera/film; slide in; take magazine off; slide out; pencil along the edges; slide in; magazine on the camera again for the next frame).
A tedious process, and perhaps something the repair shop did not want to do (or not too often)?

It is normal though for the frame spacing not to be absolutely even.
As long as there is enough space between the frames to cut and leave a rebate next to the adjoining frames, and as long as the spacing isn't that wide that the 12 frames will not fit on the roll completely, spacing is deemed to be o.k.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
E76

E76

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
401
Location
Baltimore, MD
Format
Medium Format
Hmm, $80 is a lot less than I thought it would be, but as I student I must save all I can. The procedure as described sounds easy enough, but I'd never forgive myself if I somehow managed to screw up. :D

Thanks for all the advice guys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PHOTOTONE

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,412
Location
Van Buren, A
Format
Large Format
Unless the back is overlaping frames, I would just wind a little past the arrow before you put the film insert into the shell, then wind on to frame 1. This should solve your problem with zero dollar outlay.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
, or do I have a maladjusted back? :confused:[/QUOTE]


*******
I thought this only happened to Kievaholics!!:tongue:
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
I thought this only happened to Kievaholics!!:tongue:
Why, no! Of course not.

Though there is a difference:
One of these brand's backs are maladjusted by the factory itself. They also make it hard to get them properly adjusted (which is why they themselves do not even bother - they know it would be a waste of time) by filling them up with components that are no good to begin with.
Some of the other brand's backs get maladjusted over 3 or 4 decades of hard use.
:wink:
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
[Some of the other brand's backs get maladjusted over 3 or 4 decades of hard use.
:wink:[/QUOTE]

*******
Awww shucks!:wink:
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom