• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Hasselblad 503CX or 503CW??

Man in market place

A
Man in market place

  • 0
  • 0
  • 23
Abandoned Church

A
Abandoned Church

  • 2
  • 0
  • 35

Forum statistics

Threads
203,120
Messages
2,850,114
Members
101,682
Latest member
TylerKGeorge
Recent bookmarks
3

TheToadMen

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
I'm thinking of getting me a Hasselblad (sometimes), maybe even just to be able to say I used one (although I have a Bronica SQ-B and a Hassy SWC).

It seems the 503CX is cheaper than the 503CW. Is there a big difference between these to cameras? What model should I get from the 500 range?
I'm also thinking to use it with a 50 mm lens or so.
 
Do you need Flash TTL and the Winder option? If not, a 501cm would be a solution too. Gliding Mirror but not as expensive as the CW.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you need Flash TTL and the Winder option? If not, a 501cm would be a solution too. Gliding Mirror but not as expensive as the CW.

No need for winder or flash, so I'll check out prices for a 501cm also. I'll probably do mostly landscapes or street photography in B&W. Thanks.
 
Based on my experience, if you're going to use anything longer than the 100mm the longer mirror of the bodies with the GMS would be useful.

I've got a 50 that I love but I also use a 120 and a 250 with enough frequency to wish I had one of the newer GMS bodies. I find the image cut-off at the top of the screen annoying with both these lenses. I can work around it relatively easily,with the 120 but the 250 is a real pain. (I'm always on a tripod photographing things that aren't going anywhere in a hurry so I can fiddle up and down, left and right to try and see what I'm not seeing...)

That said, I'm very happy with 500C/M.
 
Aw sorry, I really just sent that link for you to see the colours available other than black. I have a canary yellow 501; it's makes me feel better just to look at it.

They look nice indeed. I'll see if one pops up here sometimes.
 
If you don't need the winder or TTL flash, then the 501CM is what you should be looking for. Cheaper than the 503CW, maybe a little more expensive than the 503CX, which I'm guessing was designed for wedding photographers using on-camera flash. Hard to say which market these were aimed at, but the 503CW was used by a lot of studio/fashion guys burning though lots of film with an assistant loading mags as fast as they could shoot them.
 
You should look for 501C/M or 503CW - they both have the longer mirror, CW can be used with the winder and flash synchro, if you need that.
 
For me I wanted a newer camera. I found a good deal for the CW at Calumet so that's what I got. I really think regardless of what I purchased I would have been happy. I love my camera and since they basically all have the same feel and work the same you will be happy with whatever you get.
 
Since I have many "normal" looking cameras and I don't really need a Hasselblad 500 series, I think I'll wait till a nice and affordable colored one comes by. And maybe sell some other cameras first (like Rollei SL66 or Pentax 67 set).
hasselblad-501cm-colors.jpg
I haven't seen these in real live, but I think I like the yellow best. It stands out (don't know like what though), doesn't it?:blink:

Or maybe I just get me an old 500C with chrome lens made in 1967 or so (the year I was born) ...
With just one lens: a 50 or 60 mm lens I guess.

I like the chrome lenses better (just for the looks, silly me) than the modern black ones and I don't mind the "lesser" coating for I shoot mostly B&W.

There is one offered here in Europe (made in 1968) with 80 mm lens and one A12 back for Euro 800 ($ 1024) that looks nice. It comes with a Planar 80mm f2.8.
Hasselblad-500c-001.JPG Hasselblad-500c-002.JPG Hasselblad-500c-003.JPG

But it is a 4 hour drive just to go look at it. It's offered as fully functional and new light seals, but a CLA might be in order anyway due to its age.

Any reason (troubles) why I shouldn't get a 500 series body? It's just for occasional amateur photography (mostly landscape or street photography).
 
I was going to suggest a 500cm. No need for the newest bells and whistles. (Gliding mirror and TTL flash)
 
I was going to suggest a 500cm. No need for the newest bells and whistles. (Gliding mirror and TTL flash)

100% agree with this. Even a well-cared for and recently serviced 500C would be fine.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom