Hasselblad 500 c/m with cf100 3.5 planar

k.hendrik · Mar 15, 2016

http://www.fotosipkes.nl/index.php/...elblad-500-cm-cf-100-3-5-planar-occasion.html

Lot of money! but reasonable? I'm drooling for a month or so.....

jvo · Mar 15, 2016

you've been a good boy, go ahead, you deserve it!

jvo

Sirius Glass · Mar 15, 2016

One of the reasons that people come to APUG is to have their photographic desires enabled. So we here at APUG will encourage you to buy it. The 100mm lens is a very sharp flat field lens that was developed for NASA as a low distortion lens for the Lunar landing. You have been earning money to support yourself and others. That means that you have been working to buy others things that they wanted or thought that they needed. Now is your time so go buy the camera and lens.

HiHoSilver · Mar 15, 2016

Temptation's rusty rack strikes again! If that photo is the actual unit, that doesn't seem like a particularly high price. That lens has so much good written about it. I believe Sirius recently got one. My little indescretion was a humble XA from member Binglebugbog. 'Should be fun. Is this a first 'blad? If so, you'll prob. thank yourself for getting it.
Hah! good timing. 'Was hoping Sirius would weigh in.

Alan Gales · Mar 15, 2016

About a year and a half ago I sold an all black mint - condition Hasselblad 500c/m with 80mm lens on ebay for just almost $1,000 U.S. plus shipping. It did have a nice strap with it.

A 100mm is worth more than an 80mm. Plus you get a hood.

Just to give you an idea.

Alan Gales · Mar 15, 2016

About a year and a half ago I sold an all black mint - condition Hasselblad 500c/m with 80mm lens on ebay for just almost $1,000 U.S. plus shipping. It did have a nice strap with it.

A 100mm is worth more than an 80mm. Plus you get a hood.

Just to give you an idea.

Alan Gales · Mar 15, 2016

Hmmmmmm. Double post. How did that happen? I guess what I wrote must be important?

Theo Sulphate · Mar 15, 2016

That's a good combination for the price - if you buy it, you won't be disappointed.

The Zeiss 100/3.5 for the Hasselblad is outstanding.

Slixtiesix · Mar 16, 2016

The price sounds reasonable and the camera looks like it is in very nice shape.

k.hendrik · Mar 16, 2016

HiHoSilver said:
Temptation's rusty rack strikes again! If that photo is the actual unit, that doesn't seem like a particularly high price. That lens has so much good written about it. I believe Sirius recently got one. My little indescretion was a humble XA from member Binglebugbog. 'Should be fun. Is this a first 'blad? If so, you'll prob. thank yourself for getting it.
Hah! good timing. 'Was hoping Sirius would weigh in.

No, this thing will accompany a SWC/m and a SL66SE so......

Sirius Glass · Mar 16, 2016

Read the first line of my signature!

Frank53 · Mar 16, 2016

Hey, you visit the Dutch Rolleiflexclub forum as well?
Ok, don't tell anyone there I said this, but sell the sl66 and get the Hasselblad
Cheers,
Frank

k.hendrik · Mar 16, 2016

My 'shutter' is sealed... but selling a Sl66SE; tshhhh !!

Frank53 · Mar 16, 2016

k.hendrik said:
My 'shutter' is sealed... but selling a Sl66SE; tshhhh !!

Joined "the dark side" myself some time ago. It usually starts with drooling......
Would never sell my tlr though.
Frank

Slixtiesix · Mar 17, 2016

I would never sell my SL66 for a Hasselblad. Having both is nice though ;-)

Hasselblad 500 c/m with cf100 3.5 planar

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency