Hasselblad 250mm chrome lens

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 25
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 51
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 49
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 41
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 47

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,903
Messages
2,782,785
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

nsurit

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Messages
1,808
Location
Texas Hill Country
Format
Multi Format
As a new user of Hasselblad equipment, trying to judiciously add to the kit, I am wondering why there is so much difference in pricing with the older chrome and newer black 250mm lenses. The lens addition would be for a 500 C/M kit which currently includes a 60mm, 80mm and 150mm. In 35mm I'm fond of a Tamron SP 180mm f2.5 and am thinking the 250, in Hasselblad, would come close to the same look. There is a budget and I do use lens hoods. Any compelling reason to not buy the chrome lens? Bill Barber
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
I'm going through the same thought process. The difference is cost is the difference between their age and desireability... and some will talk of the technical differences like shutter capabilities and coatings. If the chrome lens is is in good operating condition, or can be brought into good condition by a routine overhaul... then it is a good option. Only concern (and not much of a concern really) is that they take B-50 filter/hood and all of my other lenses are B-60. But there is no compeelling reason that I know of to not buy and use one. I've seen people write that they will not buy/use a chrome lens because ofhte EV interlock... but that's nuts in my opinion.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
As a new user of Hasselblad equipment, trying to judiciously add to the kit, I am wondering why there is so much difference in pricing with the older chrome and newer black 250mm lenses. The lens addition would be for a 500 C/M kit which currently includes a 60mm, 80mm and 150mm. In 35mm I'm fond of a Tamron SP 180mm f2.5 and am thinking the 250, in Hasselblad, would come close to the same look. There is a budget and I do use lens hoods. Any compelling reason to not buy the chrome lens? Bill Barber

The chrome ones usually have a simpler coating, (which can look really nice in the print, by the way). With a lens hood you probably can't tell much difference between the silver and the black T*, but without it the T* would be a little bit less susceptible to lens flare.
Many great photographers have made many amazing portraits with an old silver 250. Either of them use the Synchro Compur shutter, for which it's almost impossible to find parts. CF and newer lenses have a good supply still, which is reflected in the price.
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,407
Format
Medium Format
The lens design never changed. The single coated version should perform well if a good shade or compendium is used. Once I made a test comprising several lenses, single and multicoated, shot against the sun, and the 250/5,6 with a compendium shade and mask gave by far the best results. Without a shade, all lenses suffered from horrible flare. But make sure that the shutter is working accurate if you chose a silver lens.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom