Harman Price Increases

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,972
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I don't want to sidetrack the thread but in response to two posts since my last one, I maybe need to make it clear what I was referring to in my reference to RA4. Yes I appreciate that RA4 sells in larger quantities and economies of scale might play a part but unless Ilford B&W paper sales have fallen significantly in the last 12 months I am unclear as to why the price relationship that held between RA4 and Ilford B&W has changed significantly.

If indeed B&W sales have plummeted in the last 12 months vis a vis RA4 then this kind of price rise will cause sales to plummet more and Ilford is then in a vicious circle of price increases to support a smaller sales base which leads to a further fall in sales which leads to a price increase until even the loyalist of fans cease to buy or buy in such small quantities that only a former Kentmere( small company) level of production can be sustained. As one who has seen Ilford's facility twice on tours I don't think it can do things the old Kentmere way.

It's a big facility and a lot of people depend on it remaining that way.

pentaxuser
 

aldevo

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Cambridge, M
Format
Multi Format

Nobody knows who will be the last man standing or men standing or whatever.

It's easy to pick on Kodak because they are a publicly-traded company that issues press releases in English. Fuji does not issue English-language press releases and no other manufacturer (save Lucky in China) is a publicly-held firm at all. They tell us nothing. You blink and they are gone. Witness Sterling, Forte, etc.

There's no reason why FujiFilm won't pull a Konica-Minolta and walk away from film and consumer imaging with no warning. None at all. And there's no reason why Ilford or Foma or Efke can't implode overnight a la AgfaPhoto. Again, none at all.

Kodak is hell bent on surviving - nothing else. We don't know what that means for its film business but nobody should expect product availability to do anything other than to continue to diminish as long as demand is plunging, unabated.

If you're going to continue to shoot analog then you have to face an uncertain future with, potentially, no happy ending at all. That's the price you pay.

I just dropped $600 on a Bronica SQ-AI kit, so I'm willing to pay it and suffer unhappy consequences.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

aldevo

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Cambridge, M
Format
Multi Format

Interesting. Are you suggesting that traditional B&W is losing sales to RA4-printed B&W? I tend to doubt that's true.
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format

Let’s see, Ilford raises is prices, some marketing idiot from Fuji remarks they will be the last man standing (cannot back up this worthless claim) and you think Kodak wants to get out (while introducing new films).
Such logic, it’s just amazing.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,972
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
aldevo said:
Interesting. Are you suggesting that traditional B&W is losing sales to RA4-printed B&W? I tend to doubt that's true.
Click to expand...

No not at all. I am simply saying that unless B&W paper sales have dipped alarmingly vis a vis RA4 sales then the economies of scale relationship that held good before the hikes in B&W prices should still hold good. If B&W Ilford paper was say 10% more expensive than RA4 12 months ago then I'd expect that the relationship pricewise to have continued whereas my observation is that B&W has risen in price much more than RA4.

In fact it wasn't so long ago that RA4 was much more expensive than B&W. That situation has been turned on its head in such a short period that I doubt that it is explained by a sudden increase in RA4 paper sales which might make it cheaper and a suddenr decrease in B&W sales which might adversely affect the economies of scale in B&W paper production.

pentaxuser
 

aldevo

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Cambridge, M
Format
Multi Format

There are many pricing trends I don't feel I can explain. For example, ISO 100 B&W film has suddenly become 15-30% more expensive than ISO 400 film in the USA. Even a couple years ago the reverse was true.
 

Bob F.

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
3,977
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
Well, US users at least should hold fire until Simon Galley gets into the office on Monday (assuming he is not on holiday as it's that time of year) but I suspect the US will be exempt from all or most of these rises due to the high Dollar and low Sterling values and the fact that the US is Harman's largest market by a long way.

However, as far as the UK is concerned, they have already priced me out of Warmtone and they seem determined to price me out of MGIV too. I will also be reconsidering my use of Delta 400 in 120 but changing film is a bigger step for me than paper.
 

brofkand

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
598
Location
North Carolina
Format
Digital
I'd imagine most of these price increases are simply to keep up with exchange rates.

The dollar has gained in value over a year ago while the Pound has dropped. So, without any other clarification I would say these price increases will be in the UK only. Just because the pound has dropped in value doesn't mean the silver or plastic they buy from American suppliers is 20% cheaper.

We'll see. That's my thinking, anyway. The way I see it, a roll of 120 PanF is still less than $4. That's a lot compared to the ~$2 a roll Arista, but I don't have the QC issues with Ilford that I have with Arista. For example, the last roll of Arista film I developed had the tape attaching the backing paper to the film horrbily off-line, blocking a portion of my first exposure on the roll.

I've never had such issues with Ilford (or Kodak, for that matter).
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,266
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Tom Kershaw said:
Intuitively I'd speculate the pricing of RA-4 paper is distantly related to black & white fibre base paper pricing.

Tom
Click to expand...

RA-4 paper is much higher volumes and so is more economic to make as a consequence. In addition it's manufactured at a number of sites by all the main manufacturers.

Ian
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,972
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Matt5791 said:
In which case I would imagine it is a UK thing and maybe Europe. At this time....
Click to expand...

If it is mainly or solely related to exchange rates, hasn't the pound sterling fallen more and so far recovered less against the euro than against the U.S. dollar so on that basis that would exempt the euro area from the price increases as well, wouldn't it.

If it does and the price rises only affect the U.K. then Ilford might eventually be subject to the "parallel imports" phenomenon whereby Euro dealers import products and sell back to U.K. customers for a profit but still cheaper than those customers can obtain the products in the U.K.

A situation like that creates a "bad taste" all round with U.K customers and U.K dealers in Ilford products and isn't sustainable by the party creating initiating the price rises which eventually lead to the parallel import situation thriving.

Already on the U.K. e-bay U.S. powersellers have emerged trying to sell Ilford paper. It seems they have seen an opening. Their prices are very competitive but of course they won't succeed on a small scale selling to individual buyers because of massive delivery charges compared to U.K. powersellers but deliveries of massive amounts of products to a U.K. agent for onward sale to U.K. buyers could succeed.

It happened in the 1980s in the U.K. in another industry of which I had personal knowledge. That industry had to quickly change its pricing position when its U.K. agents stopped ordering from the manufacturer and switched to ordering from that manufacturer's overseas agents.

pentaxuser
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
I'm not a big user of Ilford products, prefering Kodak for B&W film and Azo/Lodimia for prints, but as a photographer, I can think of NOTHING worse than a Kodak, Ilford or Fuji going out of business. These folks have to do what they have to do to keep the doors open. We may not like it, but we SHOULD continue to support them. They all deserve our loyalty.
 

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format

I agree with John, it's a use it or loose it situation. Let's just hope they are as good at business as they are at producing photographic products. With all of the products on the market, even though they are much less than we have seen in the many past decades, it's hard to buy enough from all the companies being one person. Since I read this thread on Friday I haven't been able to get it out of my thoughts. And I suspect that in some darkened room in an office tower a group of marketing strategists at Kodak are mulling over the reaction from the community about the rumor that Harmon is raising prices. Every time I hear about market instability it's like hearing that a friend has just gotten Cancer.
 

Ektagraphic

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,927
Location
Southeastern
Format
Medium Format
So that is a no. I kind of knew that I guess.
 

clayne

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
2,764
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
This price increase sucks - and yes if any of those big three went out of business it would be a disaster. However, this is just a price increase: one that sucks a lot! That being said - I'll be stocking up on warmtone and diversifying.
 

Steve Roberts

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
1,299
Location
Near Tavisto
Format
35mm
Analogue photographic materials must surely fall into the category of luxury items these days. When I already have no choice but to pay 22% (or whatever it is) of my income to the taxman, £750 per year to West Devon Borough Council, £500 per year on insurances (house and vehicles), c.£1500 per year on fuel (just to get to work), £540 per year for the privilege of parking near where I work, c.£1100 per year for gas/electricity/water - and those are just the living expenses that spring quickly to mind - there must be many others. Well, compared to all I can't get too excited about an average 15% increase on my photographic bill which mainly relates to 35mm plus some 120. I've always regarded 35mm film (bought in 100ft rolls) as being "cheap as chips" anyway (120 clearly has different issues) and paper is possibly for me the most visible money pit - every time a reject 10" x 8" print goes in the bin I see another 30p (six shillings!) go down the drain.
I'm sure that all this is more of an issue for larger users than me and/or those who are struggling to make a living from analogue products, but to draw an analogy with Kodachrome's demise, how many would have been happy to pay an extra 15% for K64 in the knowledge that would keep the production lines churning? Quite a few, I suspect.

Best wishes,

Steve
 

Rob Skeoch

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
1,346
Location
Grand Valley, Ontario
Format
35mm RF
When this increase was first mentioned I did email my Ilford rep here in Canada.

This is the answer I received regarding price increases in Canada....

"The price increases mentioned on APUG, etc. will not effect our pricing in Canada at all."

just wanted people to know.

-rob
 

Chris Nielsen

Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
491
Location
Waikato, New
Format
Multi Format
Steve Roberts said:
but to draw an analogy with Kodachrome's demise, how many would have been happy to pay an extra 15% for K64 in the knowledge that would keep the production lines churning? Quite a few, I suspect.
Click to expand...

The sad thing is the online price for K64 has gone up by at least 30% since the announcement of it's retirement and people appear to be buying craploads of it
 

Jid

Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
3
Format
35mm
I got an e-flyer today from Harman, it appears you can now buy from them direct via a new e-com website ( www.harmanexpress.com ). I have not had chance to see how prices compare to my local store yet but it might make getting stock easier than it has been.

Jid
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…