Harman Photo cryptic announcement/teaser

Status
Not open for further replies.

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,113
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm

So Kentmere emulsion is OK for 35mm and 120 film but cannot be used for say 4x5? I wonder what it is about an emulsion that is OK at say 6 x 9 cm or even larger if the negatives are XPan size but then fails to work at 4x5 which isn't that much bigger?

pentaxuser
 

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,100
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format

The thicker base causes issues with coating.

Coating is a dark art. The slightest change or variations can ruin the run. This is probably one of the reasons that sheet films have far less emulsions than roll films.

I believe that the best (supposed) example of this is when Kodak moved coating to the current machine, several films, disputes using the exact same emulsion recipe, had problems. They needed to tweak the recipe until the film matched the original batch as best as possible.
 
Last edited:

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,039
Format
Plastic Cameras
"Rebirth" could also refer to something more general. Since partaking of the film revival several years ago, I've shot mostly C41 CN film, and some conventional b&w, but I have not made a single analog print.
 

Xylo

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
405
Location
South of Montreal, Canada
Format
Multi Format
Kino said:
Please tell me you're joking...
Click to expand...

Sirius Glass said:
So sad!
Click to expand...

Just pulling your leg

The thing with these announcements is that we always get our hopes up really high and it always seems like the real announcement is so underwhelming.

I kinda use the Holga as a bit of a joke. When a company announces "disappointmentware" or vaporware, I always feel like the Holga is the perfect support for such shenanigans. Like the time there were rumours that Leica would venture out into medium format (which never happened) and some guy designed the Leica-H120 as a joke.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,102
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
MCB18 said:
The thicker base causes issues with coating.

Coating is a dark art. The slightest change or variations can ruin the run. This is probably one of the reasons that sheet films have far less emulsions than roll films.
Click to expand...

Coating and emulsion technology involve complex interactions, yes. Calling them a 'dark art' would be putting it a bit strongly, IMO.

I personally believe the reason why the Kentmere emulsions were never offered as sheet film is because Harman simply didn't believe the demand justified the effort of engineering those emulsions to be coated onto another base. I do not doubt in the slightest the technical feasibility of doing so, but it does likely require adjustments, and that in turn requires extensive testing, which is of course labor-intensive and therefore expensive. Given that they already coat sheet film for the Ilford sheet film products, it's likely that extending that offering with Kentmere sheet film would simply eat up part of the Ilford sheet film market share - they'd effectively be spreading out a substantially larger R&D effort across pretty much the same sales volume (but possibly a partly less profitable one, given the lower price point of the Kentmere films). This would be different if they would somehow manage to eat up e.g. Foma's market share, but given that they don't really succeed in this with the roll film products, I imagine Harman are realistic enough to understand that they wouldn't do so with the sheet film product either.

So in the end, I expect this to be associated with strategic marketing considerations more so than technical challenges. Sheet film is a relatively small niche within film photography and it doesn't always make sense to further drive up competition in such a segment.
 

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,100
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
koraks said:
Coating and emulsion technology involve complex interactions, yes. Calling them a 'dark art' would be putting it a bit strongly, IMO.
Click to expand...

I think missed the pun there…
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,113
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Am I wrong ín believing that Ilford/Harman has made no attempt to contact Photrio about its announcement? If it hasn't then despite the speculation that we may largely be in the wrong demographic you'd think it would consider Photrio to be worthwhile of inclusion in its announcement

What I can't recall is whether Ilford bothered to announce such new things as Kentmere in 120 or Ortho 80 Plus to Photrio


pentaxuser
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,102
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
MCB18 said:
I think missed the pun there…
Click to expand...

Regardless. Your post implies that emulsion coating is an unpredictable process. I don't think that's accurate. At least not for a firm that's been doing it for a century or so.

pentaxuser said:
Am I wrong ín believing that Ilford/Harman has made no attempt to contact Photrio about its announcement?
Click to expand...

Why would they try and contact Photrio (i.e. Sean)? If they wanted to use Photrio to make an announcement, they can do so directly without intervention from anyone: https://www.photrio.com/forum/forums/partner-ilford-photo.19/
It seems that whoever does marketing & comms at Harman currently is focused on other socials than forums. That's probably a good bet, too, if they want to make some noise.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,490
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Now I am walking around with one leg longer than the other! This is so embarrassing!
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,084
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format

They may have simply decided not to coat "amateur" emulsions as sheet film. For a long time most "amateur" films were 35mm only, with 120 format only popping up on some rare occasions.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,113
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
koraks, what you said in your#283 seems make sense in the business case for not bothering with sheet film for Kentmere and I found it difficult to believe that Kentmere sheets were physically not possible and yet for Ilford to reply in the manner in which it did according to retina-restoration seems incredibly disingenuous So either the text of its reply was as retina-restoration says or he misunderstood what it said in the reply or it was carelessly couched in terms that seem to be too easily misunderstood

pentaxuser
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,664
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Different base materials require different components and techniques.
And certain components and techniques aren't compatible - or aren't economically compatible - with other components and techniques.
It might be something as simple as the Kentmere emulsions causing films to curl too much for practical use in sheet film holders.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,113
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
retina_restoration said:
Are you kidding me??
Click to expand...

Can you tell me what part of my quote is concerned with kidding you? Yes Ilford's reply as stated is puzzling to me and its pure physical impossiblity, as the Ilford reply implies gives an indication that appears to be the same to koraks but there are several possibilities for this. I accept that Ilford often gives a "condensed" reply as it may have done here but was there nothing in it that indicated that there may have been other reasons as to why it wasn't feasible?

Here is what you said that Ilford said:" I had an opportunity to forward a question to an Ilford Rep a few months ago about this very matter, asking if they will produce Kentmere as a sheet film product. The answer was: No, the Kentmere emulsion making is sufficiently different from the Ilford emulsions that it cannot be adapted to sheet film production. Apparently they tried, and it didn't work out. So I expect you can cross that off your list."

The part I have "bolded" just seems to indicate that Ilford tried to coat it onto sheet form and it didn't work

If it was written in that way then it looks as if the outcome was something which was unknown to them in advance This may have been the case but it just seems strange that it almost caught them by surprise when I would have thought that their knowledge of the composition of Kentmere and of what is required for sheet film production would have indicated in advance the likelihood of its unfeasibility or otherwise

My impression is that my inquiries and questions are annoying you, so if what you said was what Ilford said without it expanding in any way on its "didn't work out " statement then fine.

I need to be honest however and state that my curiosity about what is different about Kentmere in terms of what makes it unfeasible for sheet film may lead me to ask other questions on what is different

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
Last edited:

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,366
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
I wonder if the Paterson range of chemicals and/or paper are coming back?
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,006
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Oh, the hype is dying down. Only three comments in the last 12 hours. See? This is why they need a quick reveal. Everyone will soon forget about it.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,101
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
Don_ih said:
Oh, the hype is dying down. Only three comments in the last 12 hours. See? This is why they need a quick reveal. Everyone will soon forget about it.
Click to expand...

The hype is certainly dead on their Instagram account which has had no comments for three days since they posted that dark animation. They are getting much more attention here than anywhere else because this is a chatty group with industry knowledge that likes to speculate.

They’ve managed to attract all the Instagram followers they can with no news and a lack of marketing creativity, which is about 3,400 so far, and they’ve committed the social media sin of not following any of the people who have followed them. They’re not even following the influencers that they mailed the cards to which is frankly unbelievable.

It’s like they assigned a random employee to handle this reveal, but the employee doesn’t like social media or know how it works.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,006
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
warden said:
they’ve committed the social media sin of not following any of the people who have followed them. They’re not even following the influencers that they mailed the cards to which is frankly unbelievable.
Click to expand...

That is unbelievable. Those first couple of days were gaining momentum, they probably could have picked up a lot more if they bothered to truly interact with the people they sent cards to. They also really needed something less vacuous to post after a few days - as in, they needed an actual product teaser. People can only get so excited about "nothing".
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,612
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Usually the Ilford social media accounts are handled well from what I see on Facebook and Instagram. The Harman accounts look to be handled by someone else, who's not really doing it well. The initial buzz was there but they need to keep things moving, even if there's no actual info people following on social media expect *something* even if it's more cryptic images. And interacting with the followers, especially those in the industry who they've mailed material to ought to be automatic.

This still could be something big, but the excitement is draining a bit. I'm not that bothered because I am very patient but I'd not be satisfied with whoever is handling the Harman social media accounts if I were the boss. Unless the boss has dictated how it is to be done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…