Noel, the project I have in mind needs the paper ready cut to the correct sizes and ideally RC. The whole process would have to be simple and to be feasible a finished print available in under 10 minutes which is very easy to do with RC papers.
The problem with using FB papers is the wash times needed to achieve a reasonable degree of permanence and then the drying. It's a project I discussed briefly in the past with a couple of the Ilford directors who've left.
Ian
The Direct Positive paper isn't listed in the Product Availability PDF
Two questions.
1) Will it be re-introduced as an RC paper. I had a commercial use for the RC version and had to put the whole project on hold. Presumably now Harman/Ilford make the emulsion at Mobberley the technical issues of the former Marly emulsion can be overcome. While I personally prefer FB papers to be economic and feasible the project need an RC paper.
2) Why is it only available in US sizes. I'm thinking more here of larger than 10x8, there's no 12x10 or 15x12. We don't have 14x11 or 16x12 cameras in the UK, and what about European users with Continental formats like 18x24cm, 9x12 etc.
Another option would be to use the Ilford Galerie Digital Silver paper (RC version) in camera and reversal process it. Has this been tried ?
Ian
Ian needs the RC version.
Ian,
I'm afraid I missed this thread for some reason. Please accept my apologies for not replying sooner.
We had technical problems with coating the RC version of Direct Positive and the demand for the FB version has been so great that we have been concentrating on stabilising production of that version. Even though we have finished this product for some years it is still a relatively new emulsion to us and different in many ways to the products we develop ourselves. We would like to re-introduce the RC version but I cannot say when this will happen - if and when will depend on how great the technical obstacles prove to be. Our coating attempts on RC did not meet our quality standards.
I do not know how the current format range of the Direct Positive Paper was arrived at but will ask the question.
For your third question, we have never tried reversal processing of the Digital Paper. Usually, when people find out they have to handle it in total darkness they lose interest in it for darkroom use completely. It is best suited to machine (laser) exposing for this reason and also for its design which we think makes it best suited for short, high intensity exposures.
Please send any queries like this to Technical@harmantechnology.com where we will try to deal with them as soon as possible.
Regards and again sorry,
-David.
Anyone have any thoughts about trying to print slides on this stuff?
I've used it to print old lantern slides.
'...paper is best for reversal processing, something I've done in the past and it's very easy.'
Ian
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?