StoneNYC
Member
stone
read the first line of this post..
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
Link gives me a blank page

Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
stone
read the first line of this post..
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
If it's in carry on, the film receives more radiation from being up in the sky than it gets from going through the relatively low power carry on scanner. I would insist only on having Delta 3200 or P3200 hand inspected.
And airport employees are required to be familiar with sensitized materials.
I last went through CDG in 2011, and they hand inspected the couple rolls of D3200 I had, and I sent the rest through the carryon scanner without a hitch.
What about colour films? Arent they supposed to be more affected by these scans?
My travelling with film has been very limited via air - mostly been road/train (thankful for that!)
No. ON my sister's recent Australia-Canada-Alaska trip, with 2 rolls of Provia 100F (carry-on), it passed through a total of 16 X-ray points over the 4-week trip. There is no ill-effect on either roll, but her three SD cards were corrupted, necessitating a panic call to a photo lab in Vancouver that had a copy-store of images she had printed there.
Wow. Film came through clean and the cards got corrupted?
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk
TheFlyingCamera;1562471 My shoes said:You can thank Richard Reid for that - Some airports will even scan sandals just in case you might have put a bomb in the soles.
The one that really takes the biscuit is Stansted where the goons insisted on scanning a belt made of 1" webbing with plastic fittings...
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |