Half-Frame Cameras?

Twiggy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Messages
142
Location
Canada
Format
Instant Films
In my interest of keeping film photography affordable, I am interested in getting a half-frame camera.

I am aware of the Kodak (reto) Ektar H35(N) and it's Agfa Photo competitor, between the two I'd probably choose the Agfa photo.

However I am also willing to look at the used/vintage market.

So does anyone have any recommendations for one within $100-$150 Canadian dollars?

Anyone have one they can sell?
 
OP
OP

Twiggy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Messages
142
Location
Canada
Format
Instant Films
I found this great, affordable lisitng on amazon, shipping not bad either, all under $100 included.

I assume this has half-frame ability?

Should I buy?

 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
The original Olympus Pen or Pen S cameras are very nice if you're OK with zone focus. They're in your price range, are extremely compact and have excellent viewfinders.
 
OP
OP

Twiggy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Messages
142
Location
Canada
Format
Instant Films
The original Olympus Pen or Pen S cameras are very nice if you're OK with zone focus. They're in your price range, are extremely compact and have excellent viewfinders.


Thanks, I'll look at that.

I also asked the seller of the Knoica autorelfex T if it can do half-frame.

I'll make a choice, seems Cannon Demi EE-17 is also within price range.
 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
The Autoreflex T is only a full frame camera. The early model "Auto-Reflex" is the only one of that series with the half-frame option. The round meter knob on the front is an identifying feature.
 
OP
OP

Twiggy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Messages
142
Location
Canada
Format
Instant Films
Thank you, saved me from buying the wrong Camera.

Edit: From what I am seeing, the original Autorelfex's seem to cost more than I can spend, lowest cost I saw was $177.70 and thats before shipping.

I'll check the classifieds here as well though.
 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
If you have a light meter and/or don't mind estimating exposure and focus, give the 'Pen S' a look. The f2.8 lens is excellent and plenty fast, plus the ergonomics of the camera make focussing and winding very easy. The leaf shutter is practically silent, with a release that's very nicely situated. The original 'Pen' works just as well, but the lens is one stop slower.

I just looked on the auction site and there are plenty to choose from, priced between $50 and $130 USD. I got mine for about $90 several years ago and it's still one of my favorites. The biggest advantage of any half-frame 35 is that you can generally get 75 pictures out of a 36-exposure roll of film. This can actually be a disadvantage if you're in a hurry to develop your film, so I generally reserve my half-frame usage to occasions when I'll naturally be taking lots of photos, like parties or special events.
 
OP
OP

Twiggy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Messages
142
Location
Canada
Format
Instant Films
@xkaes

Thanks, that is indeed a great list to work from.

@Lee Rust I will probably try to find an EES2 from Olympus Pens as I am still a beginner, so the light meter feature on it, is appealing.
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
I will probably try to find an EES2 from Olympus Pens as I am still a beginner, so the light meter feature on it, is appealing.

The meters in '60s-'70s-vintage half-frame non-SLR cameras are mostly selenium-cell meters. Don't count on them still working. With the EE-S/EE-S2 you can still set the aperture manually with a fixed shutter speed of 1/40, though other models with a more complete shutter speed range are obviously a lot less limiting.

I have an EE-S that I inherited from my dad, who bought it new in the early '60s when it was a current model. I remember our sending it to Olympus back around 1974 for a CLA and meter repair - probably still have the receipt buried somewhere.

Re the Konica Auto-Reflex: I had one for a while. For my taste it was ill-suited to half-frame work - the body is big, heavy and uncomfortable in hand, the mirror/shutter action is pretty loud, and the choice of lenses at the shorter focal lengths needed for wide-to-normal work on half-frame is very limited. Looked like a great idea on paper, not so much in practice. Maybe Les feels differently about his. If you decide you really want an SLR, I think any of the Pen F series (F/FT/FV) is a better choice.
 
Last edited:

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
Yes, the light meters on most 50+ year old cameras can be unreliable. There are plenty of new hand-held meters that are small, light and accurate. Many of them will mount on a flash shoe, although I wouldn't suggest that for a Pen since the addition of a meter would detract from the comfortable handling of the tiny camera. Besides, with ISO 100 or 200 film, "Sunny 16" will be fine for most daylight photos.

I have several other half-frame 35 cameras, each with their own strengths and weaknesses...

--Mercury II - mechanically unique & rugged, good optical quality, zone focus, quite awkward to operate
--Canon Dial 35 - oddball design, noisy spring-wound film advance, zone focus, auto exposure with manual option, excellent optics
--BeLomo Chaika II - made in Belarus, simple design, zone focus, focus and aperture controls similar to Pen S, finder & optics OK
--Olympus Pen F/FT - compact SLR with uncoupled meter (FT), great lenses, very loud shutter, relatively expensive to buy or repair

I still think a Pen or Pen S would be a good choice to get started, and may well be the only half-frame you'll ever need.
 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
Another half-frame Olympus to consider would be the Pen D. It has a built-in uncoupled meter that might still work, full manual exposure control with a 1/500 top shutter speed and a fast 1.9 lens. Almost all the Pens I see on the auction site are from Japan, but don't let that discourage you. Most Japanese sellers are very upstanding and the shipping times to North America can be surprisingly quick.
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
I still think a Pen or Pen S would be a good choice to get started, and may well be the only half-frame you'll ever need.

I agree with this. In general, I'd look at the early-'60s window-finder models that have manual wind and scale focus along with a decent range of manual shutter speeds - they're small, quiet, easy to carry, and well-suited to nimble, unobtrusive walkaround snapshooting in a wide range of lighting conditions.

Also agree about not sweating the meter. Either use a compact hand-held meter, or just learn to wing it - working free and easy without having to futz with a meter is a pleasure once you get the hang of it. But it doesn't have to be all-or-nothing - you can always keep a meter in your pocket in case you find yourself in unusual lighting that's difficult to judge.
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
Another half-frame Olympus to consider would be the Pen D. It has a built-in uncoupled meter that might still work, full manual exposure control with a 1/500 top shutter speed and a fast 1.9 lens.

Another +1. I have a Pen D among my other half-frame cameras. A very fun, versatile little camera - the combination of shutter speeds from 1/8 with the fast lens gives extra margin for work in low light. The last version, D3, has an f/1.7 lens, but will likely be harder to find.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,142
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Olympus pen ef. personally i'd prefer a small full-frame.... the bigger the negative....... the better the print
 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
A D3 will need a proper modern substitute for the original mercury battery, but that's not a big problem. On this particular one the front lens element is pretty messed up and those extra holes drilled in the lens ring look suspicious. You might look further... there are lots of these cameras on the Bay and you might pay $10-30 more for a better example. Look for detailed closeups through the lens from front and back (shiny & clear is always a good thing), overall cleanliness, fresh light-seal foam on the inside of the bottom cover and some kind of definitive statement about how well the camera works in general and the meter in particular. It's always nice if the seller accepts returns.
 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
Upon closer inspection of other D3 examples on offer, it looks like the holes in the lens ring are normal, but look for a nice clear lens in any case. At this moment there are 37 of this particular model camera to choose from on the Bay, so take your time. Don't overlook the D2 model... there is only a slight difference in lens speed...f1.9 vs 1.7.

The more reputable and knowledgeable the seller is, the more thorough and detailed their photos and descriptions will be.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,544
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
@Twiggy - note that, when you buy on ebay from outside the country, unless it's included in the price via ebay's global shipping program, you will pay hst and a brokerage fee when the item arrives. So, if you pay $75 plus $25 shipping, expect to pay another $25 in when the thing arrives.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,544
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
No idea what the quote is. I have a Chaika like that. It works fine - it's certainly no Olympus camera, though. There's no meter, so you'll have to figure out exposure on your own.
 
OP
OP

Twiggy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Messages
142
Location
Canada
Format
Instant Films
I just hope it's nothing religious, because keep religion away from my atheistic communist things lol, and also that it's not something personal.

Anything generic or otherwise inspiring is fine.

As for the meters, with cameras of this age, many wont work, or won't work properly, so I'd rather have no meter, than one that doesn't work, as a personal preference.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…