• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Halcyon p-phenylenediamine developer test


The numbers look more clearly defined with the D-76.
 
Keith Tapscott. said:
The numbers look more clearly defined with the D-76.
Click to expand...

When I did the tests 5 years ago I was only interested in grain and emulsion speed, but now looking at the scans for D-76 and Halcyon I agree with what you say. Since both seem to just about manage a resolution of 80 lppm, I would attribute the poorer apparent sharpness with Halcyon to lower contrast. Although underdevelopment cannot be ruled out I do believe that from time to time the use of PPD has been associated with lower contrast negatives and may be a factor here.
 
Alan,
I've tried a couple of Jay's developers and they seemed to do pretty much what he claimed, but never found them to be that "Magic Bullet" that some folks seem to be searching for. The two that came closest for me were his 510-pyro and Hypercat. I never played with Halcyon, but it looks interesting. My main developer is Xtol-R (actually Adox XT-3R) and Pyrocat-HDC. What surprised me was your first comparison with Xtol, Halcyon and Pyrocat and how poorly, compared to the other two, Pyrocat did in the resolution department. I shoot mainly medium format so grain isn't the issue for me that it is for folks that live by 35mm. Maybe that's why I'm kind of stuck in the XT-3R rut. Still, I think this old comparison might be of interest to folks looking for a fine grain film developer with pretty darn good resolving power. It might warrant trying to figure a way to squeeze more speed out of it without hurting any of it's other two good traits.
 

Now looking at the resolution including Pyrocat for the first time it seems that you are right and this type of test is not much use for evaluating resolution. The pyrocat did much better in a test I did using a different target where the lines get ever closer together. Thanks for noting this, it may be of use to me in future.

Scans retain developer properties

Here I scanned some chart lines (the full 35mm frame is about 50x the width of the chart) made from Ilford Delta 100 developed in acutance developers Rodinal 1:50 and Neofin Blue, solvent developer Xtol, and pyro developer Pyrocat HD.Scans were made with a Plustek 8100 set at 7200dpi which...
www.photrio.com
 
Alan,
I kind of figured exactly that. I've had very good luck with Pyrocat-HDC as far as resolution goes and have no complaints as to fuzzy results.
 

Allan, have you read T.H. James paper "Kinetics of Development by p-Phenylenediamine in Neutral and Moderately Alkaline Solutions"? It might help you to tweak halcyon.
 
pINO said:
Allan, have you read T.H. James paper "Kinetics of Development by p-Phenylenediamine in Neutral and Moderately Alkaline Solutions"? It might help you to tweak halcyon.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I will see if that paper can be found.
However it seems to me that is better to use Perceptol if fine grain is wanted owing to the chance of dermatitis from PPD. This is in agreement with the Kodak recommendation to use (the formerly available) Microdol-X.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register